This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
I should also point out that, although 4 April was the official closing date, all the responses that were received after that date have been included in the report.
That would allow decisions to be taken in the next parliamentary session. We do not want groups and their bank accounts simply to go out of existence without the issue ever having been dealt with.
The current system is fairly bizarre and is like bank-note counting in banks. We are still doing things in a traditional manner and there is scope to make the arguments that have been made.
Some producers are in extreme danger because they cannot borrow from the banks. The banks will not now lend readily to any producers, whether their stocks are affected by fish diseases or not, because they are no longer regarded as security.
Some producers are in extreme danger because they cannot borrow from the banks. The banks will not now lend readily to any producers, whether their stocks are affected by fish diseases or not, because they are no longer regarded as security.
It is significant that we are discussing this today, as there is some discussion about the role of the banks in Scotland not being terribly helpful in dealing with exclusion.
This sometimes required the committees to continue their planned scrutiny of a notification until a later date, such as to undertake their own stakeholder consultation.
(Aberdeen City IJB) ivLetter from Sandra Ross, chief officer, Aberdeen City Integrated Joint Board, 19 July 2019
There has been limited support to date provided by the Scottish Government on outcome based budgeting.
I would force banks to provide that service. Banking should be a social service; it should not just be about international free-market capitalism with its teeth bared.