This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
However, on the basis of the further submission that Christine Grahame made to the committee and the discussion to date in light of the committee's stage 1 report, I am satisfied with the analysis that corroboration is not a legal necessity.
We fully support the objective of maintaining and modernising Scots law in order to ensure that it is up to date, accessible and as user friendly as possible; indeed, we have said many times that we want to encourage consolidation of the law.
Some organisations have lobbied against the use of enabling powers that would allow us to do one or another or everything that the bill mentions at a future date; they say that we should do those things right now.
“Glasgow 2014—Delivering a lasting legacy for Scotland” Item 4 fits in very nicely with the evidence session that we have just had.We have been invited to respond to the Scottish Government's consultation paper "Glasgow 2014—Delivering a lasting legacy for Scotland", which was published on 15 February. The closing date for responses is 9 May. To inform our...
We are in exactly the same position as Howard Marshall—we have carried out only insulation work to date. We have been asked by one local authority to look at managing the central heating programme that it has been asked to undertake, to back up Scottish Gas.
Like others, my concern extends to why the press were so well informed, not only about the visit but about the release date. Mr MacAskill has stated clearly that he was acting in a quasi-judicial manner.
Questions and Answers
Date answered:
22 August 2001