This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
I am sure that you have reviewed the evidence that the committee has heard to date on national scenic areas. You will therefore know about the concern that the proposals in the amendment were not included in the bill.
Would the promoter recommend a high rate per mile or a lower, competitive, rate per mile approach to ticket pricing? To date, the promoter has established a fare that maximises both revenue—as far as we can see—and patronage.
I am not aware of exactly what the Crown Office's marking work to date has involved. It has certainly looked at cases being pushed out to alternatives to prosecution.
It would be useful if the bill stipulated that the situation must be reviewed and that policies should be kept up to date with current scientific knowledge and understanding.
Your submission shows that the relevant action plans date back to February 2003 and that they include issues that the committee raised in its 2001 report.
If we go back to pre-chain-linking days, the weights that were used, which reflected the shares of the different sectors in the economy, were at best three or four years out of date, and at worst seven or eight years out of date.
The paragraph should say that amendments should be lodged a minimum of two sitting days in advance of the dates of debates. We can examine that further.
The Scottish Police Federation's evidence is what would probably be described in a court as hearsay because there are no dates, no names and no pack drill. It was incumbent on the Scottish Police Federation to talk to serving officers who are employed as prostitute liaison officers.