This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
James Kelly tried to pin you down on what that means in terms of revenue streams. Where are you getting the money from to get to the break-even point that you want?
I recommend that we keep the petition open and continue the process. I agree with that. I get the feeling that more transparency in the process would help the petitioners to understand what is happening.
We should seek an explanation, but, as a former member of the Subordinate Legislation Committee, I must say that such things happen from time to time and we should not get overexcited. We will not get overexcited, but we will ask for an explanation.
It has been clarified that there is no disagreement about the chemical pathway for methanol to get back to CO2 and water, but it is clear that there is complete disagreement about the chemical environment in which it does so.
What action can be taken to help people who are not on the official list of vulnerable people but who are on the verge of having no heating on Christmas day? How can people get on to the list of vulnerable customers?
It is absolutely essential that those people continue to get access to a reasonable level of housing benefit that covers their housing costs while they rely on welfare benefits until they can get a job, if they are fit and able to work.
If the committee in general is content to have a budget adviser— I would like to be able to choose from a wider range of people, if that is possible. It is always good to get a fresh pair of eyes. If we put out the call and get a range of CVs, do we still have to appoint an adviser?