There are 13,317 results relating to "De v"
Order by
|
SPICe briefings
Date published:
6 December 2017
Prisoner voting in Scotland - a short summary - Prisoner voting in other countries
For example, in 2002 the Canadian Supreme Court ruled in Sauvé v Canada that the Canadian law prohibiting prisoners serving sentences of more than two years from voting in federal elections was unconstitutional.
Last updated:
5 December 2025
Human rights in rural Scotland 4 December 2025
Held: the budgetary re-allocation of funds was declared unlawful, on the Application of W,M,G & H v Birmingham City Council, [2011] EWHC 1147 Admin 8 McHattie v South Ayrshire Council [2020] CSOH 4; Bracking and others v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWCA Civ 1345; R (Brown) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] EWHC 3158 (Admin); R (Elias) v Secretary of State for Defence [2006] 1 WLR 3213; [2006] EWCA Civ 1293; R (BAPIO Action Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWHC 199 (QB); R (National Association of Health Stores) v De-partment of Health [2005] EWCA Civ 154; 9 R (Brown) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] EWHC 3158 (Admin); R (Elias) v Secretary of State for Defence [2006] 1 WLR 3213 10 McHattie v South Ayrshire Council [2020] CSOH 4 11 Article 19 UNCPD 12 James McEnaney, It's time for a political solution to the Mull school saga | The Herald 14 October 2025 13 Human Rights Bill for Scotland: discussion paper - gov.scot 14 Exception to the Foreign Affairs reservation, Para.7(2) Schedule 5 of the Scotland Act 1998 15 General Comment 27, UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 26 September 2025, E/C.12/GC/27 available at E/C.12/GC/27: General comment No. 27 (2025) on economic, social and cultural rights and the environmental dimension of sustainable development (advance unedited version) | OHCHR 16 Pedersen, S., Stevis, D., & Kalfagianni, A. (2024).
Last updated:
5 October 2022
PE1951_V
Sustainable Inshore Fisheries Trust submission of 24 August 2022 PE1951/V: Reinstate inshore coastal limit on the use of dredge and trawl fishing gears The Sustainable Inshore Fisheries Trust (SIFT) supports Petition PE1951 submitted by the Scottish Creel Fishermen’s Federation (SCFF) which calls for the Scottish Government to ‘Reinstate inshore coastal li...
Last updated:
22 December 2023
Budget 2024 to 2025 19 December
Sco ttish Min iste r s , sp e cial adv is e r s a nd th e Pe r m a n e n t Se cr e ta ry a r e co v e r e d by th e te r m s of th e Lobby in g (Sco tla nd) Act 2 0 1 6 .
Committees
Published:
15 December 2025
UK Supreme Court Judgement in Daly v HMA and Keir v HMA
UK Supreme Court Judgement in Daly v HMA and Keir v HMA.
Letter from the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Home Affairs, 15 December 2025.
SPICe briefings
Date published:
27 June 2022
Judicial Review
The Christian Institute and others v The Lord Advocate (2016)2Christian Institute v Lord Advocate. (2016). [2016] UKSC 51 2017 S.C.
SPICe briefings
Date published:
22 November 2019
Human Rights and the Environment - Rights of Assembly & Climate Change Protests
Jones and Others v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis.
SPICe briefings
Date published:
7 July 2025
Child abduction - Plagium
Plagium can be committed by a parent.8Hamilton v Mooney 1990 S.L.T. (Sh. Ct.) 105. (1990).9Downie v HM Advocate 1984 SCCR 365. (1984).
SPICe briefings
Date published:
27 June 2022
Judicial Review - A snapshot of some recent high-profile cases
With no reasonable justification offered for such an interference, it was found to be unlawful.
Philip v Scottish Ministers (2021)3Philip v Scottish Ministers [2021] CSOH 52 [2021] 5 WLUK 222; 2021 G.W.D. 19-267. (2020, May 19).
SPICe briefings
Date published:
16 March 2023
Children (Care and Justice) (Scotland) Bill - European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)
This can include access to documents and a right to be present at a hearing.
failure of a hearing to provide copies of expert reports to parents was found to breach article 6 (McMichael v United Kingdom (1995) EHRR 205).
depending on the seriousness of the issue, there is a right to be present in civil proceedings (X v Sweden 1959 TB 354)
a reasoned judgement should be given so that it can be challenged (Hadjianastassiou v Greece (1993) 16 EHRR 219).
