This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
The next meeting is on 22 May, and the closing date for submissions to the senior research assessor is 25 May, in order for the proposal to go to the next conveners group meeting after that for final agreement on which projects will be selected.
The letter does not contain new figures—well, they are relatively new; they have been brought up to date. Your point is that the letter does not contain any projections.
The media can represent different views.My main query concerns dates. The draft proposal suggests that the surveys will come out in March and April 2001, and that the conference will be held in May.
When would that have arrived? The paper is dated 13 March. My point relates to the evidence Professor Alan Miller gave about the appointment of a commissioner who would be responsible for implementing a freedom of information act.
Amendment 147 proposes that the outstanding balance"shall be payable on the date on which the proceeds of sale are received".Payment would be mandatory.
Members will see in the report the advice of the parliamentary law officers, who say:"It is considered that it would be inappropriate to examine the petition further at the present time and deferral of consideration to a later date would be the most appropriate course of action."
Was the minister beginning to see problems with the delivery of the quality and standards II outcomes for 2002 to 2006 overlapping with the start date of Q and S III in April? Was the conclusion of Q and S III slipping beyond the 2010 completion date?
In the case of Europe, there was a commitment in the framework agreement last July to set an end date for export subsidies. That is the first time that Europe has made such a commitment, which I welcome.
On behalf of the planning profession, I must admit that our performance in preparing and keeping statutory development plans up to date is not good. The real worry is that, when the park plan becomes out of date, the scope for inconsistency becomes even greater.