There are 5,384 results relating to "table.i V"
Order by
|
Official Report
Meeting date:
20 November 2002
Plenary, 20 Nov 2002
The information that someone is on the list will be made known to a prospective child care employer as part of a criminal record check carried out by Disclosure Scotland under part V of the Police Act 1997. There are two main ways in which an individual may be referred to the list: by an employer or through the courts.
Questions and Answers
Date answered:
19 January 2005
S2W-10192
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-9744 by Malcolm Chisholm on 12 August 2004, how many out-patients in each NHS board area were waiting for (a) less than nine, (b) less than 13, (c) less than 26 and (d) more than 52 weeks for an NHS appointment, broken down by individual speciality for the quarter to (i) March 1999, (ii) June 1999, (iii) March 2000, (iv) March 2001, (v...
Official Report
Meeting date:
31 January 2007
Environment and Rural Development Committee, 31 Jan 2007
One of those species, the ruff, is now the most common in the loch and is thought to pose a major threat to the loch's indigenous powan, which is an internationally renowned species of freshwater fish found in Loch Lomond and Loch Eck. The powan is listed in annex V of the habitats directive, so it is a fish that we want to protect.It is the Executive's str...
Official Report
Meeting date:
29 November 2006
Justice 1 Committee, 29 Nov 2006
That gave rise to the Fairchild exception, which meant that there was no need to prove specifically that one person had caused the harm, when a range of employers were potentially responsible. However, the case of Barker v Corus, which followed that, raised the issue of joint and several liability.
Official Report
Meeting date:
2 June 2005
Plenary, 02 Jun 2005
On the point about sovereignty, the interesting case of the Lord Advocate v MacCormick established that sovereignty in Scotland lies with the people.
Official Report
Meeting date:
19 September 2001
Justice 2 Committee, 19 Sep 2001
Are you asking whether the words constitute a Pepper v Hart statement? Yes, precisely. I do not have the answer to that question.
Official Report
Meeting date:
5 April 2001
Plenary, 05 Apr 2001
It is not just a matter of salt 'n sauce v salt 'n vinegar on chips. We need to ensure that we bring Scotland together.
Official Report
Meeting date:
6 June 2006
Health Committee, 06 Jun 2006
They should not sit back waiting for committee members to question them; they may also directly address other individuals around the table.I want to ensure that a number of issues are covered: patient perspectives, which are important; staff perspectives, which are also extremely important; health boards' charging regimes, on which we need to hear directly ...
Official Report
Meeting date:
26 October 2005
Plenary, 26 Oct 2005
I set out my stall: at this point I would not vote for anything that is on the table.I have been a member of the Procedures Committee for the past two and a half years.
Official Report
Meeting date:
26 September 2001
Justice 2 Committee, 26 Sep 2001
Recently, there was a case in the House of Lords—Regina v A—in which the question of whether previous sexual history could ever be relevant in such a trial was discussed.We all agree that the fact that someone has consented to a previous sexual act is not relevant to whether they consented to the act that is the subject of the charge.
