There are 5,384 results relating to "table.i V"
Order by
|
Official Report
Meeting date:
22 January 2002
Education, Culture and Sport Committee, 22 Jan 2002
The Executive's point of view on the ECHR takes into account the decision in the Starrs v Ruxton case. We do not think that there is an ECHR issue.
Official Report
Meeting date:
29 June 2000
Plenary, 29 Jun 2000
That is why we set up a review group that included Volunteer Development Scotland, the SCVO, YouthLink Scotland—which represents the uniformed bodies—and the Scottish Churches to examine part V of the Police Act 1997. The group was set up to examine the costs of the proposed checks and to consider the administrative burden that would have to be borne by sma...
Official Report
Meeting date:
4 April 2000
Justice and Home Affairs Committee, 04 Apr 2000
Those regulations will bring Scotland into line with England and Wales.Secondly, the regulations provide for assistance by way of representation to be made available without reference to an applicant's means for all proceedings under part V of the Mental Health (Scotland) Act 1984.
Official Report
Meeting date:
30 September 1999
Plenary, 30 Sep 1999
The first major matter relating to the conduct of ministers concerns an invitation to Sam Galbraith as sports minister to attend the Glasgow Rangers v Beitar Jerusalem game on 1 October 1998.
Official Report
Meeting date:
29 November 2005
Justice 2 Committee, 29 Nov 2005
In Mowbray v Crowe, Lord Macfadyen said that the current procedures tied the prosecution's hands in offering immunity.
Official Report
Meeting date:
24 May 2006
Justice 1 Committee, 24 May 2006
How is the Crown dealing with the decisions in the Holland v HMA and Sinclair v HMA cases? It accepts that there should be disclosure and has said that the information and statements that it has in its papers will be disclosed, but often those are not there.
Official Report
Meeting date:
8 March 2004
Stirling-Alloa-Kincardine Railway and Linked Improvements Bill Committee, 08 Mar 2004
You are obviously entitled to your interpretation of the cases but, with respect, I disagree with it. You mentioned three cases: S v France; Guerra and others v Italy; and Baggs v the UK.
Committee reports
Date published:
26 November 2018
Getting Rights Right: Human Rights and the Scottish Parliament
Human Human Rights in Practice: Housing available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CrSOxT6FUPE&feature=youtu.be
Heather Ford, Edinburgh Tenants Federation, explained tenants were living in damp housing with kitchens and bathrooms that needed to be upgraded.
Official Report
Meeting date:
1 November 2005
Justice 2 Committee, 01 Nov 2005
There are obvious interactions between that and what the European convention on human rights states about self-incrimination, and so on.A very important case is Mowbray v Crowe 1993 JC 212. I do not want to bore you with too many of the details, but it is a useful case.
Official Report
Meeting date:
16 March 2004
Justice 2 Committee, 16 Mar 2004
Paragraph 9 of your submission refers to the case of Burnett's Trustee v Grainger and another. You are critical of the process that arrived at the decision in that case.
