Skip to main content

Parliament dissolved ahead of election

The Scottish Parliament is now dissolved ahead of the election on Thursday 7 May 2026.

During dissolution, there are no MSPs and no parliamentary business can take place.

For more information, please visit Election 2026

Loading…

Search

There are 5,384 results relating to "table.i V"

Order by |

Refine your search

Select from the available filters to refine your search


Available filters:

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].

Official Report Meeting date: 5 March 2003

Plenary, 05 Mar 2003

When a similar amendment was lodged at stage 2, Linda Fabiani indicated that it was based on concerns arising from a judgment in the English case of Adan v Newham London Borough Council. The judgment in that case raised concerns that an internal review of a homelessness decision might be incompatible with article 6.1 of the ECHR, but it might be helpful to members if I update them on the latest legal position.A later House of Lords decision in the case of Begum v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council departed considerably from the Adan decision.
Official Report Meeting date: 26 February 2003

Plenary, 26 Feb 2003

I gave the minister notice of the case of Smith v MacKintosh, which appears on page 148 of The Scots Law Times of 1989.
Official Report Meeting date: 11 January 2001

Plenary, 11 Jan 2001

The narrowest definition was in the case of Logan v Jessop, where a breach of the peace had to involve a degree of alarm on the part of the individual.
Official Report Meeting date: 13 February 2001

Education, Culture and Sport Committee, 13 Feb 2001

It did not generate much interest, even on the back of the Scotland v England game, because of the trading uncertainty of Queen's Park Football Club and TNS.
Official Report Meeting date: 31 May 2006

Justice 1 Committee, 31 May 2006

About 20 years ago, Lord Wheatley set out, in Smith v McCallum, what were clear tests at the time.
Official Report Meeting date: 23 May 2006

Justice 1 Committee, 23 May 2006

I expect the report that the committee produces at the end of the inquiry to contribute in some way to that process.I remind members that the case of David Asbury v the Strathclyde joint police board and others is still active and as such is subject to the sub judice rule.
Official Report Meeting date: 9 November 2005

Justice 1 Committee, 09 Nov 2005

Amendment 17—which seeks to deal with the case of Wallis v Wallis, on which you have been working—is about the court's flexibility to use a date other than the relevant date, particularly if the value of the property has increased substantially.
Official Report Meeting date: 26 January 2005

Justice 1 Committee, 26 Jan 2005

I refer in particular to the case of Webster v Dominick. We have been asked to note that there was a guilty plea in the case, so the relevancy of the charge was not tested.
Official Report Meeting date: 12 January 2005

Justice 1 Committee, 12 Jan 2005

There has been case law on that point; the High Court ruled on it in the case of Webster v Dominick—2003 SCCR 525. Talking about lewd and libidinous conduct, the Lord Justice Clerk said:"In the modern law, where indecent conduct is directed against a specific victim who is within the class of persons whom the law protects, the crime is that of lewd, indecen...
Official Report Meeting date: 10 September 2003

Environment and Rural Development Committee, 10 Sep 2003

It contains requirements to group house sows and gilts, minimum space requirements and a minimum continuous solid lying area—existing buildings have until 1 January 2013 to comply with those specifications. Part V deals with piglets and changes the minimum weaning age, with the exception of all-in, all-out systems.

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].