This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
However, it is also an acknowledgement of the work that councillors have done over the years. While I was taking part in a TV debate in Wales I was harangued by a 75-year-old councillor who thought that the whole concept was an insult to the process of representative democracy.
It acknowledges that"risks have already been taken with patients lives"and goes on to say:"The PFC has and is operating outwith the standards of the pharmaceutical industry … PFC has manufactured product which has unequivocally endangered the lives of patients."
My point is about how this issue can be effectively tackled. If someone is living in deprivation, it does not matter whether they live in Morningside or a suburb of Glasgow.
We feel strongly that we are being discriminated against because members are voting to save wild mammals' lives. What about our lives? Is not it a human rights issue that you will rip apart our livelihoods and destroy our lives with the vote?
Why then did the Conservative Administration leave us a legacy whereby a third of children were born into poverty, lived their lives in poverty and died in poverty?
One member state differs from another, but people have not always felt particularly close to the European Union or that it has much meaning in their lives. You can see that in the turnout for European Parliament elections.
Those values hold strong today and will develop in the future. We are living in a new era, one in which the Scottish Parliament is strengthening further the ties between sovereign, Parliament and the people.
A national children's charity regularly advertises on television. Anybody who watches the advert will think that the charity operates in Scotland, as the advert appears on televisions in people's homes in Scotland.