There are 5,384 results relating to "table.i V"
Order by
|
Official Report
Meeting date:
28 March 2007
Justice 1 Committee, 28 Mar 2007
To introduce the changes to the benefit of the faculty, the regulations are intended to have retrospective effect.The committee may recall mention of the case of Shelagh McCall v the Scottish ministers, in which it was held that it was ultra vires to make regulations that applied retrospectively when their application caused unfair detriment to people whom ...
Official Report
Meeting date:
5 December 2006
European and External Relations Committee, 05 Dec 2006
Is that not right, Jim? Yes, that arises from Pepper v Hart. That is a matter of law, so the fact that something is in Hansard is not unimportant to the future interpretation of a doubtful matter—not that I think the point is doubtful.
Official Report
Meeting date:
25 June 2002
Subordinate Legislation Committee, 25 Jun 2002
The only Scottish case on entitlement to abortion—for a capax person—was Kelly v Kelly. That case was resolved within a week despite the fact that it stopped just short of the doors of the House of Lords.
Official Report
Meeting date:
30 October 2001
European Committee, 30 Oct 2001
Those documents are:SP 2225 (EC Ref No 7408/1/01 EUROJUST 7 REV 1)SP 2510 (EC Ref No COM(2001) 309 Volume IV)SP 2513 (EC Ref No COM(2001) 309 Volume I)SP 2514 (EC Ref No COM(2001) 309 Volume II)SP 2516 (EC Ref No COM(2001) 309 Volume VI)SP 2517 (EC Ref No COM(2001) 309 Volume V)SP 2518 (EC Ref No COM(2001) 309 Volume III)SP 2538 (EC Ref No COM(2001) 428)Is ...
Official Report
Meeting date:
30 October 2001
European Committee, 30 Oct 2001
Those documents are:SP 2225 (EC Ref No 7408/1/01 EUROJUST 7 REV 1)SP 2510 (EC Ref No COM(2001) 309 Volume IV)SP 2513 (EC Ref No COM(2001) 309 Volume I)SP 2514 (EC Ref No COM(2001) 309 Volume II)SP 2516 (EC Ref No COM(2001) 309 Volume VI)SP 2517 (EC Ref No COM(2001) 309 Volume V)SP 2518 (EC Ref No COM(2001) 309 Volume III)SP 2538 (EC Ref No COM(2001) 428)Is ...
Official Report
Meeting date:
15 February 2000
Public Petitions Committee, 15 Feb 2000
It wants the Parliament to conduct an inquiry into the condemnation by sheriffs or judges in Scottish courts of named persons who are not present as witnesses and are not represented in court, because such condemnation can result in injustice and possible public humiliation in the media.The issue arose in the aftermath of the 1996 sheriff court case, Crown v Donald Macleod, which resulted in the acquittal of the defendant, who had been charged with the sexual assault of five women.
Official Report
Meeting date:
7 March 2007
Plenary, 07 Mar 2007
As recently as last Sunday, I was confronted with a mob of supporters at Meadowbank prior to the Hibs v Rangers match. They were causing public fear and havoc until they were dispersed belatedly by one solitary police vehicle.
Official Report
Meeting date:
2 May 2001
Justice 1 Committee, 02 May 2001
As I tried to explain in my opening remarks, to comply with ECHR as it has been interpreted particularly in the Oldham v UK case, there is a requirement to give a prisoner in such circumstances the right to ask for any review to be brought forward.
Official Report
Meeting date:
8 November 2005
Edinburgh Tram (Line One) Bill Committee, 08 Nov 2005
In this case, do you think that using a figure of 0.4ms-1.75 in the N and V policy would be best practice? No, it would not.
Official Report
Meeting date:
26 September 2006
European and External Relations Committee, 26 Sep 2006
I would be pleased to ask UK ministers to make a Pepper v Hart statement when they are addressing this matter in the House of Lords, if that would assist the committee.
