Skip to main content

Parliament dissolved ahead of election

The Scottish Parliament is now dissolved ahead of the election on Thursday 7 May 2026.

During dissolution, there are no MSPs and no parliamentary business can take place.

For more information, please visit Election 2026

Loading…

Search

There are 5,384 results relating to "table.i V"

Order by |

Refine your search

Select from the available filters to refine your search


Available filters:

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].

Official Report Meeting date: 23 April 2002

Public Petitions Committee, 23 Apr 2002

The bill of suspension explains that it is being taken because the particular justice was a former employee of the complainers".I also refer in this respect to the case of Bradford v McLeod.Similar situations will occur at Dumfries and Galloway sheriff court because Kenneth Ross had many clients when he practised as a court solicitor for McGowan's.
Official Report Meeting date: 3 June 1999

Plenary, 03 Jun 1999

The order does not take away current legal rights to fish for salmon—I am sure that my constituents in the burgh of Annan, who were granted that right by royal charter by James V on 1 March 1538 will welcome that.
Official Report Meeting date: 13 December 2005

Equal Opportunities Committee, 13 Dec 2005

For clarity, I ask everyone to use each participant's full name when addressing other people at the table.I invite brief introductions from our participants.
Official Report Meeting date: 4 May 2004

Health Committee, 04 May 2004

On resuming—National Health Service (Framework for Service Change) National Health Service (Framework for Service Change) I reconvene the meeting and thank the minister for his prompt return to the table.I draw members' attention to the letter from the minister, dated April 2004, on the national framework for service change in NHS Scotland.
Official Report Meeting date: 12 February 2003

Plenary, 12 Feb 2003

Section 11(3) would have allowed Scottish ministers to lay regulations relating to part V of the Police Act 1997, but those powers already exist by virtue of the Scotland Act 1998.I move amendment 5.
Official Report Meeting date: 9 May 2006

Subordinate Legislation Committee, 09 May 2006

On section 33, "Giving of notices etc under part 1", we asked the Executive why, in section 33(2)(a)(v), it is considered that subordinate legislation is more appropriate for setting out detailed provisions.
Official Report Meeting date: 15 March 2006

Interests of Members of the Scottish Parliament Bill Committee, 15 Mar 2006

It requires the details of all visits made for whatever reason or purpose outside the UK to be registered subject to exceptions in paragraph 7(2) of schedule 1, which excludes visits"the travel and other costs of which––(a) are wholly met––(i) by the member;(ii) by the member's spouse or cohabitee;(iii) by the member's mother, father, son or daughter;(iv) by the Parliamentary corporation; or(v) out of the Scottish Consolidated Fund"—the latter would relate to ministerial visits, for example.
Official Report Meeting date: 27 September 2005

Justice 2 Committee, 27 Sep 2005

However, there was a change of Government; the incoming Labour Government repealed the 1997 act in part V of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 and since then we have continued with automatic early release.
Official Report Meeting date: 21 January 2003

Health and Community Care Committee, 21 Jan 2003

Amendments 338 and 339 will clarify the drafting of sections 54(1)(c)(iv) and 54(1)(c)(v) in light of amendment 337. Amendment 340 will delete the definitions of the terms "authorised period", "community care services" and "relevant services".
Official Report Meeting date: 26 June 2001

Justice 2 Committee, 26 Jun 2001

However, the petitioner points out that the defender often issues a string of simple denials, which means that the pursuer cannot tell whether their case is strong or weak.Although Scott Barrie is correct to say that such matters are never one-sided—I am sure that both sides are involved in causing delays—I believe that the petition raises an issue that needs to be examined.The papers contain a comment from Lord Prosser in the case of Ross v...

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].