There are 5,384 results relating to "table.i V"
Order by
|
Official Report
Meeting date:
29 March 2000
Justice and Home Affairs Committee, 29 Mar 2000
I will mention a case, to which I was referred by Professor George Gretton, namely, Shetland Salmon Farmers Association v Crown Estate Commissioners, published in The Scots Law Times in 1991.
Official Report
Meeting date:
3 September 2002
Justice 1 Committee, 03 Sep 2002
One is through the application of Hislop v McRitchie's Trustee, which is the common-scheme type of implied rights.The other situation where implied rights might exist is said in the Scottish Law Commission report to be the rule in McTaggart v Harrower.
Official Report
Meeting date:
21 March 2001
Plenary, 21 Mar 2001
The examples he used, however, such as the case of County Properties v the Scottish ministers, are mostly under appeal.
Official Report
Meeting date:
21 January 2003
Salmon and Freshwater Fisheries (Consolidation) (Scotland) Bill Committee, 21 Jan 2003
In the case of Salar Properties (UK) Ltd v Annandale and Eskdale District Council, in 1992, Lord Coulsfield was asked to consider the question.
Official Report
Meeting date:
28 September 1999
European Committee, 28 Sep 1999
The draft plan has been written with one audience in mind—directorate-general V of the European Commission. It has not been written with a view to telling a general audience or even the wider partnership what we propose to do with European social fund assistance.
Official Report
Meeting date:
28 September 1999
European Committee, 28 Sep 1999
The draft plan has been written with one audience in mind—directorate-general V of the European Commission. It has not been written with a view to telling a general audience or even the wider partnership what we propose to do with European social fund assistance.
Official Report
Meeting date:
21 January 2003
Rural Development Committee, 21 Jan 2003
That was established in case law in the case of Alexander v the Royal Hotel (Caithness) Ltd, which found that a tenant farmer has every right to withhold their rent under such circumstances.
Official Report
Meeting date:
27 November 2002
Justice 2 Committee, 27 Nov 2002
As the minister made clear, section 43 puts the issues raised in the case of A v UK into Scots law. As we heard in evidence, currently there can be no certainty that cognisance is always taken of A v UK in court decisions.
Official Report
Meeting date:
29 November 2006
Justice 1 Committee, 29 Nov 2006
That gave rise to the Fairchild exception, which meant that there was no need to prove specifically that one person had caused the harm, when a range of employers were potentially responsible. However, the case of Barker v Corus, which followed that, raised the issue of joint and several liability.
Official Report
Meeting date:
12 December 2001
Justice 2 Committee, 12 Dec 2001
Many of us might have difficulty in defining it, although there was a case, McLaughlin v Boyd 1934, reference Justiciary Cases 19.
