This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
You talk about the need to define “trauma-informed practice”, but the legislation does not do that; it simply says that the Lord President will decide at a later date what those arrangements will be.
In terms of reporting, there are two important dates. The first stocktake-type reporting on the CBD will be 2026, then there will be reporting in 2029.
Unfortunately, the Scottish Government pushed very hard against that, so we have no examples of ecosystem-based FMPs in Scotland to date. It would be a requirement of any spatially managed area that we would introduce ecosystem-based fisheries management plans.
Adequate and appropriate land is being lost at a rate of knots at our peril, and we wrote the legislation—well, I did not. It is already dated for our times. Where will we be in 15 years?
Do you have any further thoughts on the dual consultation? The consultation process to date has been very collaborative and I think that it has been appropriate and proportionate.
As I said, a commitment to keeping the Parliament up to date on EU law as it develops would be useful, particularly to this committee, so that it can assess what is happening.
It is vital to feed the most up-to-date information into the model to get the most up-to-date advice, if I can call it that, on the best level at which to set the price to get the desired benefits.This is not about being unwilling to say whether we still think that 45p is right.
It shows that the duration of attendance is important, particularly with an earlier start date under three years of age, which relates to better intellectual development.