This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
Is it in order, as this is the last meeting of the committee before the two Scotland v England games, for us to send our warmest best wishes to the Scotland team?
R (on the application of Steinfeld and Keidan) (Appellants) v Secretary of State for the International Development (in substitution for the Home Secretary and the Education Secretary) (Respondent).
However, it agreed that, when adopted by a business which was already dominant, this breached article 102 TFEU3Case t-65/98 (Van den Bergh Foods Ltd v Commission of the European Communities). (2003).
(c) a benefit payable by way of lump sum in respect of a person's having, or having had—
(i) pneumoconiosis,
(ii) byssinosis,
(iii) diffuse mesothelioma,
(iv) bilateral diffuse pleural thickening, or
(v) primary carcinoma of the lung where there is accompanying evidence of one or both of asbestosis and ...
Our legal brief mentions the McCall v the Scottish Ministers case, but that is not a good example as it involved reducing, rather than increasing, fees.
Matters are being considered in depth that were not part of the emergency legislation that was passed as a result of the case of S v Principal Reporter and Lord Advocate.
We headed the paragraph "Emission standards v quality objectives", but, rather than setting one against the other—given that both are relevant—I wondered whether members might want to remove that point.
We headed the paragraph "Emission standards v quality objectives", but, rather than setting one against the other—given that both are relevant—I wondered whether members might want to remove that point.