This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
The approach enables a wider cross-Government decision to be made.That said, one problem with the Barnett formula arrangement—I know that Professor Heald disagrees with me on this point—is that there is a de facto, implicit link between public policy in England and public policy for the devolved Administrations.
We are moving to a slightly different UK national platform that should allow us to input that data more succinctly, so that we will be able to see those causes more over time.Although the key causes tend to be human behaviour, we cannot necessarily pin it down to one particular thing, such as a barbecue.
We are talking about a cultural change, and sometimes that can be difficult to pin down. However, I have very specific examples of how the culture has changed.
The reason why our members and others are pinning their hopes on a new commissioner is that, so far, we do not have anybody fighting for us in the manner that we need.
Why are the regulations not expressed simply to say that they will not come into force on 16 August but will come in on a date in the future—or something—so that we do not pin them to a date that we know to be false?
—Official Report, 18 January 2022; c 36. We would like to pin down how much money that will bring in and over what timescale, as “billions” is an amorphous amount of money—it could mean £2 billion or £20 billion.
They are a useful starting point, but to respond specifically to Des McNulty’s question, my view is that we should be more radical and look more widely than that.
The second question is, that amendment S3M-739.1, in the name of Des McNulty, which seeks to amend motion S3M-739, in the name of Michael Russell, on the environment, be agreed to.