Where the victim is killed, if the person representing the relatives can establish that the defender owed them a duty of care, that the death was reasonably foreseeable and that negligence occurred, that is a far more direct causal connection. If, say, the son of the deceased suffered a mental illness as a result of his father’s being killed, he would have to establish that the defender owed him a duty of care because it was reasonably foreseeable that if the defender was negligent and the father was killed, the son would suffer a mental illness.