There are 88,597 results relating to "bank holiday dates 2022/1000"
Order by
|
Official Report
Meeting date:
14 May 2024
Meeting of the Parliament 14 May 2024
Owner and occupier voices must be added to the bill. If lessons to this date have taught us little, they must have taught us that.
Official Report
Meeting date:
23 March 2022
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee 23 March 2022
We can revisit the list of FMPs at a future date if we decide to introduce FMPs for non-quota stocks.
Official Report
Meeting date:
21 November 2017
Environment, Climate Change and Land Reform Committee 21 November 2017
The 2029 date applies to plants between 1MW and 5MW.
Official Report
Meeting date:
28 March 2017
Meeting of the Parliament 28 March 2017
The Parliament will well remember that, this time last year, 27 days were lost on the bridge due to adverse conditions, which correlated with a six-month delay in the future opening date. Nobody expects the bridge operatives to work in unsafe conditions, but will the cabinet secretary advise the Parliament what tolerance will be built into the new completion date?
Official Report
Meeting date:
3 November 2021
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid) 03 November 2021
However, does that mean that they received the education that they deserved, that they have come out on the other side with the knowledge bank that they will need, or that they were given the support and experience that they were owed?
Official Report
Meeting date:
3 December 2009
Plenary, 03 Dec 2009
The group's membership will not include the Royal Bank of Scotland.On RBS and its suitability to take a role in financial education in our schools, there has obviously been a substantial corporate failure by RBS in its strategic management, but it is also true that RBS contains a large number of staff whose knowledge and experience enables them to provide young people with up-to-date facts about a wide range of financial products and services and about money management and debt.
Official Report
Meeting date:
26 August 2020
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid) 26 August 2020
Since 2005, the company has been provided with £3 million in equity and loans by the Scottish Investment Bank, representing an 18.2 per cent stake in the company.
Official Report
Meeting date:
7 January 2014
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee 07 January 2014
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee 07 January 2014 Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee 07 January 2014Instruments subject to Negative Procedure Instruments subject to Negative ProcedureAct of Sederunt (Fees of Sheriff Officers) 2013 (SSI 2013/345) Act of Sederunt (Fees of Sheriff Officers) 2013 (SSI 2013/345)Environmental Protection (Restriction on Use of Lead Shot) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2013 (SSI 2013/349) Environmental Protection (Restriction on Use of Lead Shot) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2013 (SSI 2013/349)Town and Country Planning (Prescribed Date...
Official Report
Meeting date:
11 September 2013
Meeting of the Parliament 11 September 2013
Frankly, I do not think that Governments should make the decisions, although we want banks to take better decisions. I remind members that appeals against decisions of banks to reject lending have had an extremely high success rate.
Last updated:
11 June 2020
SPBill50BS052020
Disclosure (Scotland) Bill 19 Part 1—Disclosure of criminal history and other information (2) The Scottish Ministers must provide the applicant with a new Level 2 disclosure as if the applicant had made an application for the disclosure under section 15 on the date on which proceedings on the review application finally concluded. (3) If the effect of the final outcome of the proceedings is, in relation to any of the 5 information contained in the Level 2 disclosure that was subject to a review as to its accuracy, that the information is inaccurate, the Scottish Ministers must ensure that the new Level 2 disclosure contains corrected information. (4) If the effect of the final outcome of the proceedings is, in relation to any of the reviewable information that was the subject of the Level 2 review application, that the 10 information— (a) is not relevant for the purpose of the disclosure, and (b) ought not to be included in the disclosure, the Scottish Ministers must exclude the information from the new Level 2 disclosure to be provided under subsection (2). 15 (5) If the effect of the final outcome of the proceedings is, in relation to any of the reviewable information that was the subject of the Level 2 review application, that the information— (a) is relevant for the purposes of the disclosure, and (b) ought to be included in the disclosure, 20 the applicant may not specify the information in any review application made in relation to the new Level 2 disclosure or any subsequent Level 2 disclosure provided for the same purpose as the original Level 2 disclosure. (5A) Subsection (5) does not prevent the applicant from specifying the information in any review application made in relation to a subsequent Level 2 disclosure provided for the 25 same purpose as the original Level 2 disclosure if— (a) the review application in relation to the subsequent Level 2 disclosure is made after the end of such period beginning with the final outcome of proceedings as the Scottish Ministers may by regulations specify, or (b) the Scottish Ministers are satisfied that the applicant’s circumstances have 30 changed in a material respect since the final outcome of proceedings. (6) For the purposes of this section, proceedings on a Level 2 review application finally conclude on whichever of the following occurs last— (a) if a review of the accuracy of any information contained in the Level 2 disclosure is carried out by the Scottish Ministers, the date of the Scottish Ministers’ decision 35 under section 24(3), (b) if no review is carried out by the independent reviewer in relation to any of the reviewable information that is the subject of the Level 2 review application, the expiry of the period within which the applicant could have requested that the Scottish Ministers arrange for the independent reviewer to review the inclusion of 40 the reviewable information (see sections 27(2) and 29(2)), (c) if— (i) a review is carried out by the independent reviewer in relation to any of the reviewable information that is the subject of the Level 2 review application, and 20 Disclosure (Scotland) Bill Part 1—Disclosure of criminal history and other information (ii) no appeal is taken under section 33 against the independent reviewer’s decision, the expiry of the period within which an appeal could have been taken against the independent reviewer’s decision (see section 33(4)) or, if sooner, the relevant 5 date, (d) if— (i) a review is carried out by the independent reviewer in relation to any of the reviewable information that is the subject of the Level 2 review application, and 10 (ii) an appeal is taken under section 33 against the independent reviewer’s decision, the date of the sheriff’s decision in the appeal. (6A) In subsection (6)(c), the “relevant date” is— (a) where— 15 (i) the review carried out by the independent reviewer included a review under section 27 of information relating to the applicant provided by the chief constable in accordance with section 18, and (ii) both the applicant and the chief constable notify the Scottish Ministers under subsection (5) of section 33 that they do not intend to take an appeal 20 under subsection (1) of that section, the date on which the later of those notifications is made, (b) in any other case, the date on which the applicant notifies the Scottish Ministers under subsection (5) of 33 that the applicant does not intend to take an appeal under subsection (1) of that section. 25 (7) For the purposes of this section, “the final outcome of the proceedings”, in relation to any of the information that was the subject of the Level 2 review application, means— (a) where subsection (6)(a) applies in relation to the information, the Scottish Ministers’ decision, (b) where subsection (6)(b) applies in relation to the proceedings, the decision of the 30 Scottish Ministers or the chief constable as the case may be, (c) where subsection (6)(c) applies in relation to the information, the independent reviewer’s decision as notified under section 32, (d) where subsection (6)(d) applies in relation to the information, the sheriff’s decision. 35 (8) Subsections (9) and (10) apply where— (a) a new Level 2 disclosure is provided to an applicant under subsection (2), (b) information is excluded from the new Level 2 disclosure by virtue of subsection (4), (c) the applicant participates in the PVG Scheme, and 40 (d) the information that is excluded from the new Level 2 disclosure is also contained in the applicant’s scheme record in relation to a type of regulated role to which the purpose of the new Level 2 disclosure relates.
