Skip to main content

Parliament dissolved ahead of election

The Scottish Parliament is now dissolved ahead of the election on Thursday 7 May 2026.

During dissolution, there are no MSPs and no parliamentary business can take place.

For more information, please visit Election 2026

Loading…

Search

There are 5,384 results relating to "table.i V"

Order by |

Refine your search

Select from the available filters to refine your search


Available filters:

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].

Questions and Answers Date answered: 14 November 2002

S1W-31212

To ask the Scottish Executive how many people convicted of sexual offences in each of the last three years were at the time of conviction aged (a) under 18, (b) from (i) 18 to 21, (ii) 22 to 25, (iii) 26 to 35, (iv) 36 to 45 and (v) 46 to 55 and (c) over 55. The information available is given in the following table.Persons with a Charge Proved for Sexual O...
Questions and Answers Date answered: 26 August 2002

S1W-27809

On 15 May 2002, three judges of the Court of Criminal Appeal referred an appeal (McKinnon, McKay and Norwood v Her Majesty's Advocate) to a Bench of five judges with a view to clarifying an aspect of the law of concert, which applies to situations where a number of persons are accused of acting together to commit a crime.
Questions and Answers Date answered: 23 April 2002

S1W-24573

To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-21639 by Mr Jim Wallace on 1 February 2002, whether the presiding judge in the case of Thom v Hetherington (SLT 724) changed his opinion in deciding that "mutual" and "common" meant different things and that the subject march fence type boundary wall in the case was not held as common pro...
Questions and Answers Date answered: 19 October 2001

S1W-18311

I announced on 29 August that, following consideration by the Scottish Executive of the judgement issued in the High Court in London in the case of A & Others v National Blood Transfusion Service and others, the Central Legal Office (CLO) has been instructed on behalf of NHSScotland to:identify analogous actions in which proceedings have been raised in ...
Official Report Meeting date: 13 June 2006

Subordinate Legislation Committee, 13 Jun 2006

I have already mentioned the case of Daymond v Plymouth City Council, on water and sewerage charges, but I should also highlight the case of Regina v Commissioners of Customs and Excise.
Questions and Answers Date answered: 25 September 2006

S2W-28599

To ask the Scottish Executive, in light of the recent judgment by the Law Lords in the case of McFarlane v McFarlane, whether Scottish Ministers intend to propose a change to the law in Scotland that determines financial settlement on divorce.
Questions and Answers Date answered: 22 August 2005

S2W-17947

To ask the Scottish Executive when it last discussed at (a) ministerial level and (b) official level the import of illegal drugs into Scotland with representatives of (i) the Dutch Government, (ii) the UK Government, (iii) the Irish Government, (iv) the United States Government, (v) the European Union, (vi) the United Nations and (vii) NATO.
Questions and Answers Date answered: 26 June 2003

S2O-00258

To ask the Scottish Executive what precise steps it is taking as central authority under the Hague Convention in Scotland to support the Scottish mother and her attorney in the United States of America in the child abduction case Fawcett v McRoberts, and what further action is planned.
Questions and Answers Date answered: 3 March 2003

S1W-33484

To ask the Scottish Executive whether it is its intended policy that care homes will pay water charges that are five times greater than the charges paid by their counterparts in England and Wales following the Court of Session decision in the case of Scottish Water v Clydecare Ltd. I am not in a position to comment on the detail of charges to individual c...
Questions and Answers Date answered: 20 November 2001

S1W-19718

To ask the Scottish Executive what the costs would be of increasing (a) procurator fiscal and (b) deputy procurator fiscal numbers overall by (i) 10, (ii) 20, (iii) 30, (iv) 40 and (v) 50 and what the increase in numbers would be in each sheriffdom under an equitable distribution of these increases.

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].