This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
It is vital in our view that sufficient clarity on rules and guidance is created so that those concerned about subsidies to their competitors are not encouraged to pursue judicial review when it may not be appropriate or may be destined to failure.
For example, recognising that someone with chronic fatigue may experience exhaustion hours after an activity, even if they are able to complete it at the time.
So if one of the people hasn’t as removing a place where people meet, may eaten all day, perhaps they should get a bigger not support sustainable development, whereas piece of cake.
No perfect system exists but constructive dialogue with the profession may help to identify or secure agreement to optimal approaches and the inevitable trade-offs that will have to be made.
Section 10 of the bill also provides that Scottish Ministers may make regulations regarding the refusal or recovery of support where this is in the public interest.
Views on the Lord Advocate’s statement The Committee asked for our views on: “the non-legislative proposals set out in her statement and how this may work out in practice, and what impact you consider this may have on remand levels?”
A stakeholder forum could be very broad, potentially including non-governmental organisations, industry representative bodies and community groups. ESS may consider establishing stakeholder groups for specific pieces of work in the future.
A stakeholder forum could be very broad, potentially including non-governmental organisations, industry representative bodies and community groups. ESS may consider establishing stakeholder groups for specific pieces of work in the future.