There are 5,384 results relating to "table.i V"
Order by
|
Official Report
Meeting date:
29 September 2010
Rural Affairs and Environment Committee 29 September 2010
The 1981 act refers to “trap or snare” in section 11, “Prohibition of certain methods of killing or taking wild animals”, whereas the equivalent regulation in the habitats regulations refers to“traps which are non–selective according to their principle or their conditions of use”.The problem is that, although we can license the use of certain prohibited methods under the habitats regulations, the use of only the word “traps” in the regulations and the fact that the 1981 act appears to suggest that traps and snares are not the same thing mean that there is doubt about whether we can license the use of snares to take, in particular, mountain hares, which are an annex V...
Official Report
Meeting date:
25 November 2009
Economy, Energy and Tourism Committee, 25 Nov 2009
It is genuinely not clear to me which way things will go.I would guess that we will hear a lot more about bonuses in the next six months, because the banks will pay their staff big bonuses and that will hit the headlines in January or February, probably at a time when the unemployment rate is still increasing, fiscal stimulus measures are coming off and it is clear that the real economy is not going through a V...
Official Report
Meeting date:
26 May 2009
Justice Committee, 26 May 2009
The extended powers in the bill originate from a need to keep us consistent with the European convention on human rights, specifically in relation to the case of S and Marper v the United Kingdom, in which the European Court of Human Rights criticised the blanket retention of DNA in England and praised the specific and targeted Scottish regime on DNA profil...
Official Report
Meeting date:
29 April 2009
Education, Lifelong Learning and Culture Committee, 29 Apr 2009
Once Scottish ministers have issued notice of quantification, any refusal to pay on the part of the authority concerned is a breach of a statutory obligation.Such a scenario arose in the case of East Renfrewshire District Council v Glasgow City Council, to which Mr Macintosh referred.
Official Report
Meeting date:
3 December 2008
Plenary, 03 Dec 2008
Quite simply, our future is being mortgaged to pay for the mistakes of the past.It is worrying that commentators now talk about a W-shaped recession instead of a straight down, straight up, V-shaped recession. They say that, because of the enormous interest payments on the massive debt that we have undertaken, when we start to recover in a year's or possibl...
Official Report
Meeting date:
2 September 2008
Justice Committee, 02 Sep 2008
Prior to the House of Lords judgment in the case of Johnston v NEI International Combustion Ltd, insurers had not challenged the right of pleural plaques sufferers to claim damages.
Official Report
Meeting date:
30 June 2010
Meeting of the Parliament 30 June 2010
I understand that amendment 188 seeks to deal with one of the most serious consequences of the Harris v Her Majesty’s Advocate judgment, but I do not think that it is necessary if the Government’s amendment 63 is agreed to.
Official Report
Meeting date:
2 March 2010
Rural Affairs and Environment Committee 02 March 2010
Should the bill clarify the position in relation to the Whitbread v Macdonald case in order to stop crofters avoiding the landlords’ clawback?
Official Report
Meeting date:
12 June 2008
Plenary, 12 Jun 2008
Resolved, That the Parliament recognises that the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body ("the SPCB") commissioned and received a report from an independent review panel on the reimbursement of expenses for Members of the Scottish Parliament, notes the SPCB's responsibility to present a scheme to Parliament, and therefore; (a) by virtue of sections 81(2) and (5)(b) and 83(5) of the Scotland Act 1998 (i) confers functions on the SPCB to pay allowances to members in respect of expenses or costs incurred in each financial year in accordance with the Reimbursement of Members' Expenses Scheme ("the Scheme") annexed as Annex 1 to this resolution and confers other functions on the SPCB as specified in the Scheme; (ii) determines that the various limits on expenses or costs under the Scheme are as set out in the Schedule of Rates annexed as Annex 2 to this resolution and that such limits are applicable until the SPCB exercises its power under the Scheme to uprate or vary them; (iii) determines that the Scheme shall come into effect on 1 October 2008, subject to any arrangements made under sub-paragraph (vi); (iv) directs the SPCB to make such arrangements as it may consider necessary or expedient to allow transition from the Members' Allowances Scheme agreed to by resolution of the Parliament on 21 June 2001 ("the Previous Scheme") to the Scheme, including, but not limited to, continuing in force any provisions of the Previous Scheme beyond 1 October 2008, making apportionments between the Previous Scheme and the Scheme or making arrangements for particular cases or particular classes of case as appropriate; (v...
Official Report
Meeting date:
8 February 2011
Scotland Bill Committee 08 February 2011
Currently, that could be characterised as a devolution issue and could make its way up to the Supreme Court.If we wish the Supreme Court to deal with such issues, there is tremendous scope to expand their number, particularly given the forthcoming provisions under title V of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
