Skip to main content

Parliament dissolved ahead of election

The Scottish Parliament is now dissolved ahead of the election on Thursday 7 May 2026.

During dissolution, there are no MSPs and no parliamentary business can take place.

For more information, please visit Election 2026

Loading…

Search

There are 5,384 results relating to "table.i V"

Order by |

Refine your search

Select from the available filters to refine your search


Available filters:

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].

Official Report Meeting date: 22 September 2010

Meeting of the Parliament 22 September 2010

I am pleased that the Government is updating it and would be grateful to know when the update will be published.A case called I v Finland was completed last year after a long and winding contortion through the European courts.
Official Report Meeting date: 24 February 2010

Health and Sport Committee 24 February 2010

I notice that the European Court of Justice has yet to issue its decision in the case of the Commission of the European Communities v the French Republic, Republic of Austria and Ireland.
Official Report Meeting date: 15 December 2009

Justice Committee, 15 Dec 2009

What was your authority there? Balabel v Air India. It is in our written submission.
Official Report Meeting date: 1 October 2009

Plenary, 01 Oct 2009

That is particularly true of the July 2008 ruling on Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council v Bainbridge and Others, which centred on whether pay protection arrangements that favour male employees could be justified.
Official Report Meeting date: 14 January 2009

Plenary, 14 Jan 2009

In order for the SNP to get its budget bill passed, there must be negotiations, some give and take, and perhaps even an acceptance that another policy or point of view is better than its own.As the Scottish media do their best to hype up the budget discussions into something akin to an old firm clash or even a Scotland v England encounter, they are being ai...
Official Report Meeting date: 1 June 2006

Justice 1 Committee, 01 Jun 2006

That the Justice 1 Committee resolves that the Minister for Justice should deliver to the Committee two reports authored by John MacLeod and a further report authored by Michael Pass in the matter of Shirley McKie v Scottish Ministers.—Stewart Stevenson.
Official Report Meeting date: 25 January 2011

Scotland Bill Committee 25 January 2011

There is quite a lot of evidence from the courts—such as Gaines Cooper v HMRC and the Davies case—that the UK definition of residence is creaking at the seams.
Official Report Meeting date: 29 September 2010

Rural Affairs and Environment Committee 29 September 2010

The 1981 act refers to “trap or snare” in section 11, “Prohibition of certain methods of killing or taking wild animals”, whereas the equivalent regulation in the habitats regulations refers to“traps which are non–selective according to their principle or their conditions of use”.The problem is that, although we can license the use of certain prohibited methods under the habitats regulations, the use of only the word “traps” in the regulations and the fact that the 1981 act appears to suggest that traps and snares are not the same thing mean that there is doubt about whether we can license the use of snares to take, in particular, mountain hares, which are an annex V...
Official Report Meeting date: 25 November 2009

Economy, Energy and Tourism Committee, 25 Nov 2009

It is genuinely not clear to me which way things will go.I would guess that we will hear a lot more about bonuses in the next six months, because the banks will pay their staff big bonuses and that will hit the headlines in January or February, probably at a time when the unemployment rate is still increasing, fiscal stimulus measures are coming off and it is clear that the real economy is not going through a V...
Official Report Meeting date: 26 May 2009

Justice Committee, 26 May 2009

The extended powers in the bill originate from a need to keep us consistent with the European convention on human rights, specifically in relation to the case of S and Marper v the United Kingdom, in which the European Court of Human Rights criticised the blanket retention of DNA in England and praised the specific and targeted Scottish regime on DNA profil...

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].