There are 5,384 results relating to "table.i V"
Order by
|
Official Report
Meeting date:
23 January 2014
European and External Relations Committee 23 January 2014
The Court of Justice says that such withdrawal must be subject to review by the courts and to a proportionality analysis and test. The case of Rottmann v Bavaria addresses the matter.From a classic public international law point of view, one would think that who does or does not get citizenship would be a matter wholly and purely for an individual member st...
Official Report
Meeting date:
13 November 2013
Infrastructure and Capital Investment Committee 13 November 2013
Indeed, housing association boards are not dominated by any contracting authority; they are comprised mainly of unpaid volunteers from various walks of life who serve on them.I appreciate that this goes back to a 2004 case—the European Commission v France—in which French housing associations were put under the microscope.
Official Report
Meeting date:
14 December 2011
Infrastructure and Capital Investment Committee 14 December 2011
We have trialled that in Crumlin, in Wales, where we took a 14km fibre along electricity infrastructure and then down medium and low-voltage poles into a home, where it was converted and they use 50 megabit broadband and the V+ service. We think that that could contribute to a reduction in cost.
Committee reports
Date published:
13 November 2019
Stage 1 Report on the Scottish Elections (Franchise and Representations) Bill
These rules apply to all parliamentary elections (to the UK Parliament, the Scottish Parliament, the European Parliament and the Welsh and Northern Ireland Assemblies), and all local government elections.
In 2005, in the case of Hirst v United Kingdom (No 2),iiEuropean Court of Human Rights.
SPICe briefings
Date published:
28 October 2019
The European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill - Implications for Scotland
Part IV - institutional and other horizontal arrangements.
Part V - forward process.
The initial provisions section describes some core values, rights and data protection arrangements as the basis for co-operation.
Official Report
Meeting date:
25 February 2015
Local Government and Regeneration Committee 25 February 2015
We have heard quite a lot about the Brightcrew Ltd v City of Glasgow Licensing Board court decision.
Official Report
Meeting date:
27 October 2014
Local Government and Regeneration Committee 27 October 2014
The bill requires public bodies to consider how requests are “likely to promote or improve— (i) economic development, (ii) regeneration, (iii) public health, (iv) social wellbeing, or (v) environmental wellbeing” However, it does not say how those decisions should be prioritised or balanced.
Official Report
Meeting date:
7 December 2010
Public Petitions Committee 07 December 2010
I will give you some practical examples—they might sound like terribly controversial cases, but I am just using them for the purposes of illustration.In the case of Mary Buchan Forbes v Aberdeenshire Council and Trump International Golf Links, Mary Forbes was told that she did not have title to take the case to court, because she did not have an adjacent pr...
Official Report
Meeting date:
16 November 2010
Subordinate Legislation Committee 16 November 2010
Rather than our having the existing bespoke system that was set up in 2002 after the S v Miller case, which the then Scottish Executive lost—and which was always intended to be an interim scheme, although it has been with us since 2002—section 178 onwards of the bill will move the entire state funding of legal representation in children’s hearings to the Sc...
Official Report
Meeting date:
5 May 2010
Education, Lifelong Learning and Culture Committee 05 May 2010
It will still be decided on the same criteria as in the Children’s Hearings (Legal Representation) (Scotland) Rules 2002, in consequence of the S v Miller case, and the 2009 amending rules, in consequence of the SK v Paterson case.
