Skip to main content
Loading…

Search

There are 44,074 results relating to "who is my msp"

Order by |

Refine your search

Select from the available filters to refine your search


Available filters:

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].

Official Report Meeting date: 4 April 2001

Plenary, 04 Apr 2001

Would it be possible to ask the guidance of the Presiding Officer as to how MSPs can raise the subject of civil servants' behaviour in the chamber following allegations against Dr Paul Brady— No, I am sorry, Mr Lochhead.
Official Report Meeting date: 31 January 2001

Standards Committee, 31 Jan 2001

We have talked about the matter before and I am concerned that MSPs do not have time to go to every group that they have joined.
Official Report Meeting date: 20 September 2000

Plenary, 20 Sep 2000

Does it suggest that there might be privatisation of the family planning agency in the future? I am ashamed to admit, as an MSP who represents an Edinburgh constituency, that—unusually—I did not read last night's Edinburgh Evening News.
Official Report Meeting date: 4 July 2000

Transport and the Environment Committee, 04 Jul 2000

The order comes into force on 7 July 2000, and the time limit for parliamentary action expires on 18 September 2000. Any MSP may lodge a motion to propose to the lead committee that the order be annulled.
Official Report Meeting date: 16 March 2000

Plenary, 16 Mar 2000

I am convinced that the Scottish Parliament, working with the Westminster Parliament, the Treasury and our own ELL department, can secure the changes that many MSPs want. We want to create a climate of real opportunity and real change, and acknowledge that no one—globally—owes us a living.
Official Report Meeting date: 16 March 2000

Plenary, 16 Mar 2000

Will Donald Dewar give a commitment, as the First Minister and as a Glasgow MSP that, should he fail to cap the excessive expenditure on the Holyrood project, and it increases to a penny more than £109 million, he will insist that Glasgow is considered as a serious bidder to host the Scottish Parliament?
Official Report Meeting date: 27 January 2000

Plenary, 27 Jan 2000

In the light of John Cronin's release from supervision, does he share my concern that many female lawyers and MSPs appear to be reluctant to comment, on the record, on that and similar cases?
Official Report Meeting date: 19 January 2000

Transport and the Environment Committee, 19 Jan 2000

If we decide to accept the invitation as a committee rather than as individual MSPs, do we need to seek further permission and are we then required to report on our findings?
Questions and Answers Date answered: 11 October 2006

S2W-28909

The Workshops werepublicised on the Committee’s public website and anyone was welcome to attendand indeed some MSPs did. In view of the complexity of the subject matter, engagement and feedback was primarily sought fromNHSScotland, but other interested parties including, for example, the Royal Colleges,BMA and CoSLA were also invited to participate.
Questions and Answers Date answered: 17 May 2006

S2W-25303

To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-23155 by Cathy Jamieson on 20 March 2006, whether it will now reconsider its decision not to publish the MacLeod reports and the other report referred to, in light of the public comments made in the Scotsman newspaper on 27 March 2006 by the former Solicitor General for Scotland and High Court Judge, Lord McCluskey, that this rule “has no bearing whatsoever outside the confines of a live litigation in court”, that “there is absolutely no rule or basic principle of Scots law that prevents the Scottish Executive from making the reports in question available to MSPs...

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].