This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
., Gill, J., Hu, Y., Zeps, N., Lequertier, V., … Enticott, J. (2023). Hospital length of stay prediction tools for all hospital admissions and general medicine populations: systematic review and meta-analysis.
In the same written submission, Professor Freedman stated that the ECHR ruling to which Tim Hopkins had referred to was Goodwin v the UK.xviiiOfficial Report, 6 December 2018, Col. 25.
Retrieved from <a href="http://www.bundesrat.de/SharedDocs/drucksachen/2017/0201-0300/235-17.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=5" target="_blank">http://www.bundesrat.de/SharedDocs/drucksachen/2017/0201-0300/235-17.pdf?
Members will be aware that the 2010 act was introduced in response to the Supreme Court ruling in Cadder v Her Majesty’s Advocate.Disapplying the financial eligibility test will make it easier for advice to be provided to suspects in some circumstances.
The cabinet secretary will take questions at the end of his statement, so there should be no interruptions.14:20 On 26 October 2010, the United Kingdom Supreme Court issued its decision in the case of Cadder v Her Majesty’s Advocate. The case considered the law and practice in Scotland of interviewing detained persons in a police station without ensuring th...
The Lord Advocate's reference of 2001 and McKearney v Her Majesty's Advocate in 2004 made it clear that the law was unsatisfactory, and at that point the Scottish Law Commission got involved.
It is fair to say that there is a degree of common consent that Dundee City Council does a decent job—except for the V&A, but I did not say that. This takes me back about 40 years, to when I was doing urban studies at the University of Edinburgh and looking with Geoffrey Best at the Victorian period and the creation of large-scale urban intervention.
It would certainly be a significant change from what is normally viewed as necessary in Scotland, but we are coming into uncharted waters with the case of Cadder v Her Majesty’s Advocate. However, the provisions in the bill do not reflect what would normally be required in terms of corroborated evidence.
The extension of the clawback period will also help to suppress speculation.The Government accepts that the Whitbread v Macdonald loophole needs to be closed—members are aware of the irony in that.A number of issues that the committee of inquiry on the future of crofting did not highlight have emerged during the course of the bill, such as the use of stated...
I support suspension of the petitions until we have the outcome of the Schalk and Kopf v Austria case, which may not just influence the Scottish Government but require it to take action.