Skip to main content

Parliament dissolved ahead of election

The Scottish Parliament is now dissolved ahead of the election on Thursday 7 May 2026.

During dissolution, there are no MSPs and no parliamentary business can take place.

For more information, please visit Election 2026

Loading…

Search

There are 5,384 results relating to "table.i V"

Order by |

Refine your search

Select from the available filters to refine your search


Available filters:

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].

Official Report Meeting date: 7 November 2017

Meeting of the Parliament 07 November 2017

In fact, it was no less a figure than the then Lord President, Lord Gill, who said in his judgment in the case of Pairc Crofters v the Scottish Ministers: “In my view, the expression sustainable development is in common parlance in matters relating to the use and development of land.
Official Report Meeting date: 3 October 2017

Justice Committee 03 October 2017

Since the introduction of the act, there have been many occasions when fans have reported what they have believed to be inappropriate and abusive behaviour. For example, at the Hibernian v Heart of Midlothian Scottish cup final some years ago, a Hearts supporter made racist and homophobic comments.
Official Report Meeting date: 6 September 2017

Rural Economy and Connectivity Committee 06 September 2017

The Scottish ministers were challenged on a definition of sustainable development in the case of Pairc Crofters v the Scottish Ministers, which took place a number of years ago.
Official Report Meeting date: 4 September 2012

Justice Committee 04 September 2012

We have a wheel, and we need to work with what we have. The issue with B v G and the proposed Scottish civil justice council is that we need to ensure not only that the processes are fit for purpose, but that people get the best out of their interaction with the civil courts.
Official Report Meeting date: 7 February 2012

Justice Committee 07 February 2012

Something is coming up from the depths of my memory about the case of Noel Ruddle v the Secretary of State for Scotland, in which the prisoner had not been given medication or treatment and so had to be released.
Official Report Meeting date: 23 March 2010

Justice Committee 23 March 2010

The original case, way back, was Logan v Jessop, from which the High Court retreated to some extent.
Official Report Meeting date: 11 March 2009

Local Government and Communities Committee, 11 Mar 2009

It is difficult to do that without talking about council compromise agreements, and it is difficult to talk about them without talking about the English case of Allen v GMB. Would you like to respond to the description of that case in Mark Irvine's written submission?
Official Report Meeting date: 11 March 2008

Justice Committee, 11 Mar 2008

I quote a letter on the Scotland Bill that my predecessor received from the then Secretary of State for Scotland, Donald Dewar, who of course later became First Minister. In the context of Stewart v Secretary of State for Scotland, he wrote:"It was made very clear by the House of Lords in their recent decision in Stewart v Secretary of State that they considered that the guarantee of judicial independence of Sheriffs rested on the fact that before any Sheriff could be dismissed it was necessary to have a report from the Lord President and the Lord Justice Clerk.
Official Report Meeting date: 10 September 2013

Meeting of the Parliament 10 September 2013

He was making sure that Europe knew that we were not a tiny little dark nation on the edge of the European continent. Then James V built the palace within Stirling castle, which has just been all done up—it is beautiful.
Official Report Meeting date: 29 June 2010

Justice Committee 29 June 2010

The letter also corrects two factual errors that were made during the evidence session on the Criminal Legal Aid (Scotland) (Fees) Amendment (No 2) Regulations 2010 (SSI 2010/212).I appreciate that committee members are concerned about the implications of the Cadder v HMA case and the guidelines that the Lord Advocate issued on 9 June.

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].