There are 43,908 results relating to "who is my msp"
Order by
|
Official Report
Meeting date:
5 September 2006
Procedures Committee, 05 Sep 2006
That is based on the assumption that you can have a normal committee of MSPs. I said not "a committee of normal MSPs" but "a normal committee".
Official Report
Meeting date:
31 May 2000
Standards Committee, 31 May 2000
The fact that Adam's name is not on the list either might indicate that more MSPs are involved. I think that Karen is correct to make her point, but I am not sure that the list of the MSPs who have declared an interest in being a member of the group is complete.
Official Report
Meeting date:
11 May 2005
Public Petitions Committee, 11 May 2005
There has been a consultation on the issue, which closed on 16 March. I hope that the MSP in question has responded directly to that consultation.
Official Report
Meeting date:
30 January 2003
Plenary, 30 Jan 2003
Now that we are coming to the end of the first four-year session of the Scottish Parliament, it is important to note that the Standards Committee has never recommended sanctions against any MSP. Moreover, the committee has not had to deal with any issues of probity in relation to any MSP.
Official Report
Meeting date:
4 November 1999
Plenary, 04 Nov 1999
Given that since the inception of the Parliament many sections of the public have been baying for the blood of MSPs, does the minister agree that there is now a laudable and, indeed, novel opportunity for MSPs to give the public what they want, by going to the conveniently located centre at Laurieston Place as soon a...
Official Report
Meeting date:
11 December 2001
Local Government Committee, 11 Dec 2001
MSPs will end up bearing the brunt of the planning system.
Official Report
Meeting date:
13 November 2001
Education, Culture and Sport Committee, 13 Nov 2001
There are different relationships with different MSPs, depending on where you come from.
Official Report
Meeting date:
18 January 2000
Rural Affairs Committee, 18 Jan 2000
As you have pointed out, convener, it is open to any MSP to lodge a motion for annulment.
Official Report
Meeting date:
28 March 2006
Local Government and Transport Committee, 28 Mar 2006
In those circumstances, a letter from their MSP might be appropriate, but if they had a strong grievance because they felt that a procedure had been carried out in the wrong way and they wanted financial recompense, their MSP's involvement would probably be inappropriate.
Official Report
Meeting date:
25 November 2003
Standards Committee, 25 Nov 2003
If we are going to do that, I suggest that we also ask one of the MSPs involved to come too. That is only fair, as the MSPs can answer better to the Standards Committee.
