There are 43,909 results relating to "who is my msp"
Order by
|
Official Report
Meeting date:
27 March 2002
Standards Committee, 27 Mar 2002
The members' interests order is for MSPs, so they should be the first group of witnesses.
Official Report
Meeting date:
31 May 2000
Standards Committee, 31 May 2000
If we accept that voluntary organisations and trade unions have a right to engage with MSPs, will our inquiry focus only on how MSPs interface with the professional lobbying companies?
Official Report
Meeting date:
20 April 2005
Public Petitions Committee, 20 Apr 2005
My primary purpose is to identify a forum for MSPs to decide that question. MSPs are not paid an hourly rate or for a 48-hour working week.
Official Report
Meeting date:
26 September 2000
Equal Opportunities Committee, 26 Sep 2000
I thought that the Parliament had someone who was responsible for the training of MSPs. Perhaps we have to approach those members of staff.Training for ourselves and other MSPs is a good idea.
Official Report
Meeting date:
8 May 2001
Finance Committee, 08 May 2001
It is probably too late to ask a specific question about the cladding costs of the rear wall of the MSP building, as the contract has probably been let.
Official Report
Meeting date:
20 June 2000
Public Petitions Committee, 20 Jun 2000
Yes. The next point is on improving MSPs' awareness of petitions. List and constituency MSPs will be made aware, by a brief e-mail, of petitions lodged in their area.
Official Report
Meeting date:
15 June 2005
Communities Committee, 15 Jun 2005
I am conscious, as I am sure you are, that MSPs send out lots of documents to people and that community groups in particular are sometimes overwhelmed by a sea of paper.
Official Report
Meeting date:
27 April 2000
Plenary, 27 Apr 2000
I asked nine intelligent and knowledgeable people whether they could name their MP, MSP and councillor. Eight named their MP, six named their MSP, and four named their councillor.
Official Report
Meeting date:
2 March 2004
Procedures Committee, 02 Mar 2004
Having that kind of public consultation, involving a citizens jury-type body prioritising members' bills, would be extremely interesting for voters and would give individual MSPs a chance to make their case to the citizens jury.
Official Report
Meeting date:
7 May 2002
Local Government Committee, 07 May 2002
I can vouch for the fact that neither the boundary commission nor the Scottish Executive formally consulted me as a Glasgow MSP. To my knowledge, apart from the MSP who represents the area covered by the boundary change, no Glasgow MSP was asked for their views.
