There are 5,384 results relating to "table.i V"
Order by
|
Official Report
Meeting date:
21 December 2022
Meeting of the Parliament 21 December 2022
I want to ensure that nobody is compelled to speak about a holder of a GRC in a particular way simply because they hold a GRC. The judgment in Maya Forstater v Centre for Global Development made clear that protection of a belief means nothing without the ability to express that belief.
Official Report
Meeting date:
12 November 2015
Devolution (Further Powers) Committee 12 November 2015
We are particularly interested in form V, which is the absent voting statement, and I can tell the committee that many colleagues in the Electoral Commission are happy that that has been revised.
Official Report
Meeting date:
17 December 2013
Justice Committee 17 December 2013
In her opinion on the case of Her Majesty’s Advocate v McCrossan, Lady Paton gave a clear steer that the changes need to be made.
Official Report
Meeting date:
25 October 2011
Scotland Bill Committee 25 October 2011
I can send the committee a note on cases relating to Germany and the case of López Ostra v Spain, which was quite significant for the Spanish system, so that it can be fully apprised of the situation.
Official Report
Meeting date:
27 November 2018
Health and Sport Committee 27 November 2018
I am interested in Professor Britton’s submission, which refers to the European convention on human rights and cites the case of Elberte v Latvia in 2015. I am sure that my colleagues are familiar with that case, but a brief summary is that Mrs Elberte’s husband died in a car accident, and nothing in his passport indicated that he wanted to donate his organ...
Official Report
Meeting date:
25 October 2017
Education and Skills Committee 25 October 2017
Paragraph 79 of the Supreme Court judgment references the judgment in the case of Gillan v United Kingdom, which talks about who an instrument applies to and “the number and status of those to whom it is addressed.”
Official Report
Meeting date:
21 March 2017
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee 21 March 2017
The committee might have heard of an English case called Beswick v Beswick. It was a simple case in which a man who owned a coal business wanted to retire and sell it to his nephew.
Official Report
Meeting date:
12 March 2026
Meeting of the Parliament 12 March 2026 [Draft]
A doctor told me about the ruling in the case of Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board, which said that there is a duty on a doctor to ensure that the patient is as informed as possible about all their treatment options.Does Liam McArthur think that, as the law currently stands, and if amendments 18 and 19 were not agreed to, in an ideal scenario, assisted ...
SPICe briefings
Date published:
26 November 2024
Adults with incapacity - 2024 update
Mental Welfare Commission response to queries related to when to use s13ZA v Guardianship following the Cheshire West Supreme Court decision.
SPICe briefings
Date published:
17 November 2021
Miners' Strike (Pardons)(Scotland) Bill 2021
The definition has since been reinterpreted in a more narrow way in the case of Smith v Donnelly in 2001iSmith v Donnelly [2001] ScotHC 121 so that it covers public conduct which is: (i) severe enough to cause alarm to ordinary people; and which (ii) threatens serious disturbance to the community.
