There are 5,384 results relating to "table.i V"
Order by
|
Official Report
Meeting date:
21 June 2012
Meeting of the Parliament 21 June 2012
Rod Campbell’s constituency contains some of the finest golf courses in Scotland; his constituents will benefit from the V&A, because people who come to get a bit of culture will also bring their golf clubs and head to St Andrews.
Official Report
Meeting date:
8 September 2015
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee 08 September 2015
That was discussed in the case of Lamb v Lord Advocate, so that is the standard.
Official Report
Meeting date:
11 November 2014
Health and Sport Committee 11 November 2014
At the moment, that right applies only to those at the state hospital, but in light of the RM v the Scottish Ministers case, the bill now proposes to extend the right to those in medium-secure units, which we supposedly have an adequate supply of—that particular building programme has now been completed and we now have a unit at the Murray royal hospital de...
Official Report
Meeting date:
21 January 2014
Health and Sport Committee 21 January 2014
The amendment would also ensure that any service users will be supported in their involvement.Proposed new subparagraphs (dc)(iv), (dc)(v) and (dc)(vi) would ensure that staff are embedded to participate, and allow the authority to use expertise from other organisations in the third sector within the community as it sees fit.Amendment 202 highlights the nee...
Official Report
Meeting date:
17 March 2010
Local Government and Communities Committee 17 March 2010
I can reel off the cases that have been heard in England—Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council v Bainbridge and others, and so on.
Questions and Answers
Date answered:
20 April 2010
S3W-32652
To ask the Scottish Executive what the (a) date and (b) location was of each ministerial visit to the Edinburgh South parliamentary constituency by each cabinet secretary in (i) April 2009, (ii) May 2009, (iii) June 2009, (iv) July 2009, (v) August 2009, (vi) September 2009, (vii) October 2009, (viii) November 2009, (ix) December 2009, (x) January 2010, (x...
Questions and Answers
Date answered:
14 March 2008
S3W-10920
Having consulted with Lord Justice Campbell, as required by section 5 of the 2005 act, I have determined that the inquiry''s terms of reference will be: to inquire into the steps that were taken to identify and verify the fingerprints associated with, and leading up to, the case of HM Advocate v. McKie in 1999, and to determine, in relation to the fingerp...
Official Report
Meeting date:
15 December 2010
Meeting of the Parliament 15 December 2010
Equally, whether psychiatric loss should be included in non-patrimonial loss is subject to conflicting outer house decisions: Gillies v Lynch and Ross v Pryde. I am concerned that, as far as I can see, we have no mechanism in Scots law for resolving those difficulties, other than by introducing legislation to the Par...
Official Report
Meeting date:
24 March 2010
Meeting of the Parliament 24 March 2010
In doing so, I propose to quote pretty extensively from the Scottish Law Commission report number 218, which we all have available to us.In particular, I want to highlight the issues that are raised by what the Scottish Law Commission describes as the third application under English law, namely the case of Regina v Andrews of 2008. For those who may not recall the details, let me quote:“In R v Andrews, the respondent had been acquitted of indecently assaulting and then raping SN, a girl of 15 who assisted at a summer camp run by his company.
Official Report
Meeting date:
5 November 2020
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid) 05 November 2020
Here in Scotland, the Lord Justice Clerk, Lady Dorrian, recently discussed section 6 in the case of Ali v Serco Ltd, providing guidance on how it should be interpreted.
