Scottish MPs raised that they felt the Bill was straying into areas of devolved competence;
the need for new measures of success for agriculture beyond yield;
the lack of provision for farm advice in the Bill, to support farmers to make the transition;
a lack of vision to protect rural communities;
a lack of provision to protect agricultural workers;
Environment:
the need to maintain food production abroad so not to risk offshoring the UK's environmental impact;
disappointment that the Bill is not clearer about financially rewarding a transition to 'agroecology', or a whole-farm approach to agriculture with the environment at its core;
the need to enshrine baseline environmental standards that all farmers should adhere to, whether in receipt of funding or not, and the lack of provision for this in the Bill;
that the Bill is not ambitious enough about climate change or the environment by banning the most damaging practices and taking on board best-practice recommendations from e.g. the Environmental Audit Committee's Soil Health Inquiry;
while there are powers conferred on the Secretary of State, MPs raised the the overall lack of duties on the Secretary of State to e.g. safeguard the environment;
lack of incorporation of the UK Committee on Climate Change's advice for reaching net-zero;
Food:
lack of consideration in the Bill for the whole food system, including:
food prices and food poverty;
healthy food
food sustainability
that only reporting on food security every five years is inadequate; many MPs felt that the UK Government should report every year to begin with;
Funding:
the need to consider currency fluctuation, and whether support to farmers will take this into account...