There are 5,384 results relating to "table.i V"
Order by
|
Official Report
Meeting date:
23 June 2015
Justice Committee 23 June 2015
Would you agree that the test in Hunter v Hanley is a test for professional negligence—for want of a better word—and whether there has been a failure to exercise reasonable care and skill?
Official Report
Meeting date:
23 February 2016
Justice Committee 23 February 2016
She talks about some guidance having come from the Supreme Court in the case of Gow v Grant but says, in her second paragraph: “It is impossible in my view to provide any further guidance within the legislative framework that would facilitate the understanding or application of section 28 because, as was identified at the time these provisions were in cont...
Official Report
Meeting date:
19 November 2015
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee 19 November 2015
Paragraph 18 of the explanatory notes for that particular exception refer to particular case law in which the legal concept of journalism is discussed—the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v Times Newspapers Limited—in which there was a discussion of the concept of journalism in law.
Official Report
Meeting date:
10 December 2014
Local Government and Regeneration Committee 10 December 2014
That happened recently with a case in Aberdeen, Ask Entertainment v Aberdeen licensing board. In that case, a licensee had his licence revoked because of police information that was presented to the licensing board that a director of the licence-holding company was connected to or involved with serious and organised crime.
Official Report
Meeting date:
3 April 2014
European and External Relations Committee 03 April 2014
We are citizens as individuals, which is important.I want to put on record my concerns about the secretary of state’s argument in relation to the case he cited in his evidence to the committee—that of Rottmann v Bavaria. That case formed a core of his argument as to why our citizens would suddenly not be part of the European Union.
Official Report
Meeting date:
26 June 2013
Rural Affairs, Climate Change and Environment Committee 26 June 2013
You will be aware of the ruling on the Salvesen v Riddell case. I believe, Alison, that you and the convener were both at Community Land Scotland’s conference, at which Professor Alan Miller said that ECHR should not be seen as a red card to land reform, community ownership, the possible right to buy for tenants or any such issues.
Official Report
Meeting date:
15 May 2013
Rural Affairs, Climate Change and Environment Committee 15 May 2013
At the risk of pushing that, I remind you of the case of IO and LO v Aberdeen Council and the policy consequences of assuming that everything is tied up in a timescale.
Official Report
Meeting date:
25 January 2012
Rural Affairs, Climate Change and Environment Committee 25 January 2012
Richard Blake”—of Scottish Land & Estates—“mentioned the Fleming v Ladykirk Estates case, which demonstrated that a tenancy could be assigned to a nephew.
Last updated:
29 September 2020
Standing Orders 5th Edition
A Private Bill shall on introduction be accompanied by— (za) a written statement signed by the promoter which states that in the promoter’s view the provisions of the Bill would be within the legislative competence of the Parliament; (a) Explanatory Notes which summarise objectively what each of the provisions of the Private Bill does (to the extent that it requires explanation or comment) and give other information necessary or expedient to explain the effect of the Private Bill; (b) a Promoter’s Memorandum which sets out— (i) the objectives of the Private Bill; (ii) whether alternative ways of meeting those objectives were considered and, if so, why the approach taken in the Private Bill was adopted; and (iii) the consultation which was undertaken on those objectives and the ways of meeting them and on the detail of the Private Bill together with a summary of the outcome of that consultation (including, in the case of a Private Bill to which Rule 9A.1.1A refers, the consultation carried out in accordance with Rule 9A.1.4A); (c) in the case of a Private Bill to which Rule 9A.1.1A applies— (i) an Estimate of Expense and Funding Statement setting out the estimated total cost of the project proposed by the Private Bill and anticipated sources of funding to meet the cost of the project and such other financial details as the Presiding Officer may determine or, if any of the information is not included, details of and reasons for the omission or omissions; (ii) such maps, plans, sections and books of references as the Presiding Officer may determine and if the promoter is unable to produce any of these documents, a written statement giving details of and reasons for the omission or omissions; and (iii) an Environmental Statement setting out such information on the anticipated environmental impact of the Bill as would (if it applied to the Private Bill) be required by such environmental legislation as the Presiding Officer may determine; v5 Chapter 9A Rule 9A.2 s (d) a Promoter’s Statement which sets out— (i) in the case of a Private Bill which contains provision which will affect heritable property, details of the notification of the proposed Private Bill given by the promoter to such persons or classes of person having an interest in heritable property affected by the Private Bill as the Presiding Officer may determine; (ii) in the case of a Private Bill where the promoter is a body corporate or an unincorporated association of persons, such details as the Presiding Officer may determine of the notification of the proposed Private Bill given by the promoter to and the consent to the proposed Private Bill obtained by the promoter from members of that body corporate or unincorporated association of persons and such other persons or classes of person as the Presiding Officer may determine; (iii) in the case of a Private Bill which contains provision to confer powers upon or modify the constitution of any body corporate or unincorporated association of persons named in the Private Bill but not being the promoter, such details as the Presiding Officer may determine of the notification of the proposed Private Bill given by the promoter to and the consent to that provision obtained by the promoter from that body corporate or unincorporated association of persons; (iv) details of the advertisement of the promoter’s intention to introduce the Private Bill in accordance with the determination of the Presiding Officer; (v...
Last updated:
29 September 2020
Standing Orders 5th Edition 4th Revision
A Private Bill shall on introduction be accompanied by— (za) a written statement signed by the promoter which states that in the promoter’s view the provisions of the Bill would be within the legislative competence of the Parliament; (a) Explanatory Notes which summarise objectively what each of the provisions of the Private Bill does (to the extent that it requires explanation or comment) and give other information necessary or expedient to explain the effect of the Private Bill; (b) a Promoter’s Memorandum which sets out— (i) the objectives of the Private Bill; (ii) whether alternative ways of meeting those objectives were considered and, if so, why the approach taken in the Private Bill was adopted; and (iii) the consultation which was undertaken on those objectives and the ways of meeting them and on the detail of the Private Bill together with a summary of the outcome of that consultation (including, in the case of a Private Bill to which Rule 9A.1.1A refers, the consultation carried out in accordance with Rule 9A.1.4A); (c) in the case of a Private Bill to which Rule 9A.1.1A applies— (i) an Estimate of Expense and Funding Statement setting out the estimated total cost of the project proposed by the Private Bill and anticipated sources of funding to meet the cost of the project and such other financial details as the Presiding Officer may determine or, if any of the information is not included, details of and reasons for the omission or omissions; (ii) such maps, plans, sections and books of references as the Presiding Officer may determine and if the promoter is unable to produce any of these documents, a written statement giving details of and reasons for the omission or omissions; and (iii) an Environmental Statement setting out such information on the anticipated environmental impact of the Bill as would (if it applied to the Private Bill) be required by such environmental legislation as the Presiding Officer may determine; (d) a Promoter’s Statement which sets out— 5th Edition, 4th Revision, 24 March 2017 (i) in the case of a Private Bill which contains provision which will affect heritable property, details of the notification of the proposed Private Bill given by the promoter to such persons or classes of person having an interest in heritable property affected by the Private Bill as the Presiding Officer may determine; (ii) in the case of a Private Bill where the promoter is a body corporate or an unincorporated association of persons, such details as the Presiding Officer may determine of the notification of the proposed Private Bill given by the promoter to and the consent to the proposed Private Bill obtained by the promoter from members of that body corporate or unincorporated association of persons and such other persons or classes of person as the Presiding Officer may determine; (iii) in the case of a Private Bill which contains provision to confer powers upon or modify the constitution of any body corporate or unincorporated association of persons named in the Private Bill but not being the promoter, such details as the Presiding Officer may determine of the notification of the proposed Private Bill given by the promoter to and the consent to that provision obtained by the promoter from that body corporate or unincorporated association of persons; (iv) details of the advertisement of the promoter’s intention to introduce the Private Bill in accordance with the determination of the Presiding Officer; (v...
