As I outlined in my response to the committee's stage 1 report, we consider that it might be disproportionate to provide that offenders under the age of 18 who are convicted of offences concerning consensual sexual conduct with older children should always be made subject to sex offender notification requirements.Amendments 167 and 168 make the same changes in respect of the offences concerning older children engaging in sexual activity with each other.Amendment 171 amends schedule 4 to remove the reference to the offence of shameless indecency from schedule 3 to the 2003 act. The case of Webster v...