There are 5,384 results relating to "table.i V"
Order by
|
Last updated:
26 June 2025
For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers from GLP 26 June 2025
Yours faithfully, Jolyon Maugham Executive Director
pdf.
application/pdf.
166097.
For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers from GLP 26 June 2025.
Last updated:
13 June 2025
PE2102_H
The case in question is that of HMA v. Daniel Cieslak where the High Court judge published a detailed statement setting out why she considered an absolute discharge was appropriate in this particular case.
Last updated:
30 April 2025
For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers from Faculty of Advocates 22 April 2025
RDean of Faculty d FACULTY DEAN OF Telephone +44 (0)131 260 5622 Facsimile +44 (0)131 225 5341 ADVOCATES LIBRARY PARLIAMENT HOUSE EDINBURGH EH1 1RF www.advocates.org.uk
pdf.
application/pdf.
297192.
For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers from Faculty of Advocates 22 April 2025.
Last updated:
28 October 2022
PE1950_B
My decision was based on my assessment of risk v benefits of hospital care when the NHS is under such pressure.
Last updated:
22 June 2022
Supplementary Evidence from Robin White
So clearly Equality Act ‘sex’ is ‘legal’ not biological. 24. And when cases like A v Chief Constable and MB v Sec of State (benefits case) taken into account, GRA not only route to being treated in one’s affirmed sex.
Last updated:
19 October 2021
Registration form for the Cross-Party Group on Medicinal Cannabis
Anticipated Topics ✓ Access to Bedrolite, other cannabis-based drugs, high costs ✓ Red Card (Colorado), MedCan Card for Medical Cannabis ✓ Patient Rights (human rights) v Public Health ✓ NHS v Private Treatments ✓ Medical Benefits – risks, side effects ✓ Reducing Stigma – evidence based to unlock institutional (e.g.
Last updated:
21 May 2025
For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers from legal academics 12 May 2025
Dr Daragh Murray, School of Law, Queen Mary University of London 8 R (Authentic Equity Alliance CIC) v Equality and Human Rights Commission [2021] EWHC 1623 (Admin). 15.
Last updated:
15 June 2023
Flexibility Works Submission Child Poverty and Parental Employment
Lower earners also miss out on financial savings, such as off peak travel and childcare because they are less likely to be able to work flexibly: • 63% e of people earning more than £50K regularly work from home v 24% of peopl ning less than £20K ear . of higher earners are full time remote v 10% of workers earning less than £20K • 18% . • 25% of people earning £50K+ can make informal amends to their work pattern v 9% of people earning under £20K • 18% of people earning £50K+ compress their hours v 7% of people earning under £20K Lack of flex/visible flex is a barrier to progression early one in four (23%) Scottish workers ‘definitely’ or ‘probably’ wouldn’t apply for a • Nrole if it didn’t mention flexible working.
SPICe briefings
Date published:
22 November 2019
Human Rights and the Environment - Use of Human Rights Arguments in Climate Change Litigation
The Netherlands: Urgenda Foundation v State of the Netherlands ruled that the Dutch government violated its duty of care to its citizens with failing to take adequate action in addressing climate change.
Last updated:
12 December 2025
20251212Correspondence from the Minister for VCS to Convener DPLR Committee Contract Formation and
In both McNeill v Aberdeen City Council and JH&W 3 Lamont of Heathfield Farm v Chattisham Lord Drummond Young identified the court’s equitable control as an important feature of the remedy.
