There are 5,384 results relating to "table.i V"
Order by
|
Official Report
Meeting date:
3 November 2020
Justice Committee 03 November 2020
We cited in our submission the case of the bill of suspension by Holman Fenwick Willan LLP and Duff & Phelps Ltd v the procurator fiscal at Glasgow.
Official Report
Meeting date:
30 January 2018
Justice Committee 30 January 2018
Under the Lugano convention, as I explained earlier—because of the decision in Gasser v MISAT—they do not have to give way to London.
Questions and Answers
Date answered:
1 November 2012
S4W-10452
To ask the Scottish Government how many deaths of (a) males and (b) females aged (i) 10 to 16, (ii) 17 to 24, (iii) 25 to 30, (iv) 31 to 35, (v) 36 to 40 and (vi) over 40 in each NHS board area have been attributed to rheumatoid arthritis in each year since 2007.
Official Report
Meeting date:
3 February 2026
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee 03 February 2026 [Draft]
Someone whose care ended up making him disabled will bring a meaningful discussion to the table.I have not got my website set up yet.
Last updated:
11 October 2019
$name
(h) in each of the following paragraphs, for each occurrence of the expression “road works authority” substitute “issuing authority”— (i) paragraph 3(3), 30 (ii) paragraph 4(3), (iii) paragraph 6(3) and (5)(a), (iv) paragraph 7(4)(a), (v) paragraph 8(1), (2)(a) and (3), (vi) paragraph 12(1) and (2). 35 unctions in relation to the Scottish Road Works Registe...
Official Report
Meeting date:
19 February 2026
Meeting of the Parliament 19 February 2026 [Draft]
We welcome the announcement that the UK Government has committed funding for the remainder of the current study, as that will enable us to complete the initial work on considering improvements to the key route at Springholm and Crocketford and to identify a preferred route option by early 2027.For Women Scotland Case For Women Scotland Case To ask the Scottish Government whether it plans to continue providing funding to any organisations that challenge the judgment in the For Women Scotland v...
Official Report
Meeting date:
11 November 2025
Meeting of the Parliament 11 November 2025
There will be a short pause before we move on to the next item of business.Transgender Prisoners (Legal Action) Transgender Prisoners (Legal Action) To ask the Scottish Government what its justification is for pursuing legal action in relation to its policy on transgender prisoners, in light of the judgment in the case, For Women Scotland Ltd v the Scottis...
Official Report
Meeting date:
4 September 2025
Meeting of the Parliament 04 September 2025
There are on-going discussions in relation to the upgrade of the road, and the Government will play its full part in all those discussions.Supreme Court Judgment Supreme Court Judgment To ask the First Minister whether he will provide an update on the steps that the Scottish Government is taking as a result of the Supreme Court judgment in For Women Scotland Ltd v the Scottish ministers. (S6F-04252) The Government has made clear since the Supreme Court ruling that we accept the judgment and that we are taking forward detailed work that is necessary as a consequence.
Official Report
Meeting date:
29 April 2025
Meeting of the Parliament 29 April 2025
I say again that the matter is for the Government, and, as I said previously, the ministerial code is a matter for the First Minister in the first instance.Topical Question Time Topical Question TimeEqualities and Human Rights Commission Interim Update (United Kingdom Supreme Court Judgment) Equalities and Human Rights Commission Interim Update (United Kingdom Supreme Court Judgment) To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to the interim update from the Equalities and Human Rights Commission on the practical implications of the recent UK Supreme Court judgment in For Women Scotland v...
Official Report
Meeting date:
24 April 2025
Meeting of the Parliament 24 April 2025
It is for local authorities to come to their own decisions, but they must operate within the statutory provision that the Parliament has determined on the question.Public Sector Equality Duty Public Sector Equality Duty To ask the First Minister what impact the Scottish Government anticipates that the Supreme Court judgment regarding For Women Scotland Ltd v the Scottish Ministers will have on the implementation of the public sector equality duty in Scotland.
