To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-21639 by Mr Jim Wallace on 1 February 2002, what its response is to the statement by the presiding judge in the case of Thom v Hetherington (SLT 724) on the third day of proof that the subject in the case, described as a "mutual" wall, was legally held as "common property pro indiviso" as the words "mutual" and "common" were interchangeable both meaning the same thing and to the fact that the judge referred defence counsel to p639 of The Law of Land Ownership in Scotland...