This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
Amongst a number of recommendations, the Committee called on the Government to set out the purpose of planning on the face of the Bill, to provide further support to disadvantaged communities to help shape planning decisions in their area, and to include an "Agent of Change" principle in the Bill; a principle that puts the onus on developers to mitigate pre-existing noise impacts in order to protect cultural venues, such as local music venues.
We would expect Revenue Scotland to give guidance on whether a person doing any of the following would be considered to be travelling in a higher class of travel:
obtaining a better seat at no extra cost and on a first-come first-served basis;
purchasing goods and services on board;
paying extra for the right to choose a seat, for a seat with extra legroom, to be seated next to an empty seat or for an empty seat;
paying extra for benefits such as pre...
If any member objects to a single question being put, they should say so now.As no one objects, the next question is, that motions S3M-6680 to S3M-6683, in the name of Bruce Crawford, on approval of SSIs, be agreed to.Motions agreed to,That the Parliament agrees that the draft National Health Service (Reimbursement of the Cost of EEA Treatment) (Scotland) Regulations 2010 be approved.That the Parliament agrees that the draft Town and Country Planning (Fees for Applications and Deemed Applications) (Scotland) Amendment (No. 2) Regulations 2010 be approved.That the Parliament agrees that the draft Applications by Creditors (Pre...
Amendment S3M-5572.1, in the name of Jackie Baillie, and amendment S3M-5572.2, in the name of Ross Finnie, are pre-empted. The next question is, that motion S3M-5572, in the name of Mary Scanlon, on prescription charges, as amended, be agreed to.
How can changes be highlighted, instead of being submerged in a longer, pre-existing list of substances? SEPA will hold a list that any member of the public will be able to check.
I am not sure whether you will choose to beat it by being quicker or by taking more time. I will leave that up to you. As a pre-emptive strike, I say that I think we will probably fail to be quicker than the House of Commons committee.
That is a matter of considerable local controversy and has been raised with ministers. The deadline seems to pre-empt a decision that is not only wrong but has not been made.
Another theory is that the condition is caused by remnants of tissue that remain from the earliest stages of pre-birth development. All those theories are plausible, but we need to explore them further.