For example, in finalising the JFS officials have sought to: set out more clearly how an ecosystem-based approach will be embedded in policies, • supporting the ecosystem objective; emphasise more clearly the relationship between fishing and the wider marine • environment, acknowledging it can be compromised by human-induced pressures including fishing activity and impacted by environmental threats such as climate change; redraft the JFS to highlight our understanding that managing these pressures as a • whole, is fundamental not only to having a healthy marine environment, but also to the future of sustainable fisheries management; recognise more clearly the interdependencies between the range of sea users and the • competing spatial pressures - how these can lead to displacement, for instance, and may have adverse impacts more widely such as socially, economically or environmentally; highlight that in this policy space, a number of considerations must be appropriately • balanced due to the interdependencies between the range of sea users and the competing spatial pressures; and strengthen the JFS by making clearer the need to consider the relationship between • marine spatial planning and fisheries management measures where co-location occurs so that key policies are more joined up, ensuring the effective use of marine space and resources Specifically on the question relating to time-bound targets it is worth reiterating that the JFS sets out the FPAs collective ambition for the policies which will shape the management and use of our fisheries.