There are 5,384 results relating to "table.i V"
Order by
|
Official Report
Meeting date:
16 January 2018
Environment, Climate Change and Land Reform Committee 16 January 2018
The way that we apply it is very much in line with the case law of Lawrie v Muir. In that case, the full bench concluded that an irregularity in the obtaining of evidence does not necessarily mean that the evidence is inadmissible.
Official Report
Meeting date:
18 January 2024
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee 18 January 2024
I raised the issue of innovation, which I have not seen much evidence of, except for the V&A in Dundee. I was assured that it would get back in touch with ideas, and some of those have come back in, to be fair—I have yet to read them.
Official Report
Meeting date:
25 August 2020
Justice Committee 25 August 2020
There has only been one significant case—Irene Adams, MP v Guardian Newspapers Limited—and it did not run to completion.
Last updated:
10 May 2023
Full Report International Models of Social Care
Health & social care in the community, 28(5), 1459–1467. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12967 Wilkinson, A., Haroun, V., Wong, T., Cooper, N., & Chignell, M. (2019).
Official Report
Meeting date:
28 January 2025
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee 28 January 2025
I am interested in your assessment of the extent to which the current criminal law is clear, and the extent to which the case of Ross v Lord Advocate 2016 made the position clearer.
Official Report
Meeting date:
30 November 2021
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee 30 November 2021
On that, I quote the words of Lord Reed, in the case of Unison v Lord Chancellor, in 2017, in the Supreme Court: “The constitutional right of access to the courts is inherent in the rule of law.
Official Report
Meeting date:
25 November 2021
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee 25 November 2021
The particular example that is given in our committee papers—I wish that I could say that it was my clever thinking, but it is not—is discussions in the light of the 2018 Supreme Court case R v Mackinlay and others (Respondents).
Last updated:
25 October 2019
$name
This has frequently been cited, including in the Evidence and Procedure Review, as a reason why commissions are not used more often. 75. The Court in MacLennan v HMA noted, “this problem could be solved, however, by introducing a relatively simple provision permitting the evidence of young children to be taken on commission at any time after the appearance ...
Last updated:
3 December 2025
Human rights in rural Scotland 2 December 2025
HMSO, London. Sawkins, J. & Dickie, V., (2008). Great Britain: England and Wales, and Scotland.
Last updated:
8 May 2025
BB20250509
S6W-37344 Annabelle Ewing: To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of whether its response to the Supreme Court ruling regarding For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers is in full compliance with said ruling.
