There are 151,297 results relating to "flexible workforce development fund"
Order by
|
Official Report
Meeting date:
3 February 2021
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid) 03 February 2021
We know that £22 million of additional funding has been earmarked for the Scottish welfare fund, so why are so many people being turned away?
Questions and Answers
Date answered:
29 May 2018
S5W-16663
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made regarding the development of trauma-informed schools. The Scottish Government supports development of trauma-informed services and work is underway to raise awareness of the impact of trauma and adverse childhood experiences amongst various sectors.
Official Report
Meeting date:
12 June 2024
Meeting of the Parliament 12 June 2024
Migrant workers are vital in addressing the decline of our working-age population, and Scottish employers are increasingly dependent on migrant workers for a growing proportion of their workforce. The work of our independent expert advisory group on migration and population has consistently shown the economic benefits that migration brings to Scotland.
Official Report
Meeting date:
8 September 2022
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid) 08 September 2022
I strongly believe that the trade union voice—the workforce voice—must be heard across the entirety of the labour market.
Last updated:
28 April 2020
Supplementary Delegated Powers Memorandum Disclosure Scotland Bill
The regulation making power, which is administrative in nature, is required to ensure there is flexibility so that the principles on the face of the Bill keep pace with developments in jurisprudence.
Official Report
Meeting date:
30 June 2022
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid) 30 June 2022
Housing Developments (Social Infrastructure) To ask the Scottish Government how many housing developments in Scotland are currently unable to progress as a result of funding for schools and social infrastructure not being in place.
Official Report
Meeting date:
9 December 2021
Meeting of the Parliament 09 December 2021
Some £30 million of that investment will support the continuation of the rural and islands housing funds, which have been described in a Scottish Land Commission report as “game changers” for community-led housing development.
Committee reports
Date published:
21 December 2023
Stage 1 Report on Visitor Levy (Scotland) Bill - Exemptions and rebates
r=15536&mode=pdf</a>
ETAG supported local authorities having flexibility to introduce exemptions, but suggested, “perhaps there are some categories of exemptions that could be included in a national framework, with a local authority having some flexibility to go further should it so wish.”4Official Repo...
Committee reports
Date published:
6 April 2022
Inquiry into the Scottish Government’s International Work - Role of Parliament
Role of Parliament
Scrutiny of international development spend was something addressed by Scotland’s International Development Alliance, who saw room for improvement in the interest both of best value and policy coherence—
“We cannot see value for money unless we see it as connected to everything else that is going on in the Scottish context and, again, the Parliament has a role in ensuring that that happens.”iOfficial Report, 13 Jan 2022, Cols 20-21
They proposed “a normative approach” to “inflation-proof the budget and drive towards political consensus, saying that more scrutiny was “essential”.Response 417297969 to Inquiry into the Scottish Government’s international work - Scottish Parliament - Citizen Space
The Committee very much recognises the importance of parliamentary scrutiny of international development spend, particularly in light of the increase in the scale of the funding plus the changes introduced by the 2021 Review of International Development Policy.
Official Report
Meeting date:
7 February 2024
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee 07 February 2024
We need to float the idea of a different funding model, which might lead to delays” and then that was communicated upward, or did ministers ask officials whether there was the funding for the project and, if not, whether a different funding model needed to be looked at?
