This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
Despite the overall trends not moving substantially, there has been an uptick in sedentary behaviour, which is a definite risk. As Ailsa Wyllie said, across the governing body landscape, there is quite a lot of engagement at junior level.
The Government must restore education standards by taking a tougher approach to bad behaviour, bringing back the focus on knowledge in the curriculum and investing in teaching posts.
However, the unintended consequence is that that is driving what is not necessarily the right behaviour. I agree, so is there a need for the SFC to have more flexibility?
We have a First Minister who wants to announce a change to the ministerial code today but forgets his behaviour in the Alex Salmond inquiry or, indeed, the Michael Matheson scandal.
There is a balance to be struck between not introducing any unintended consequences or perverse behaviour into markets, and reflecting on what the local needs are.
I do not want to say that it is all doom and gloom, but it really is far from great. Consumer behaviours have undoubtedly changed. People are working from home and the culture has changed.
One of the fundamental policy objectives is to change consumer behaviour, just as the behaviour of hundreds of millions of other consumers across the world has been changed.
The Morgan review and other evidence that we have heard suggested that the focus often ends up being on children and young people who present with challenging behaviour, and that that is sometimes at the expense of other children in the class, who might also have additional support needs but do not present such behaviours.