This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
In addition, at a Bureau meeting, Business Managers may request that certain motions are retained if, for example, the motion is to be debated at a future date. Removal of motions lodged before 9 May 2023 5.
Under section 28(2) of the Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Act 2010, instruments subject to the negative procedure are required to be laid at least 28 days before they come into force, not counting recess periods of more than four days.
5 Work programme (in private):
The Committee considered its approach to developing its work programme and agreed to invite the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Veterans to give evidence and to hold a series of roundtable evidence sessions after the summer recess. The Committee also agreed to hold a business planning day.
Action: CPG secretariat to work with NPFS and SPION to produce a discussion paper ahead of a dedicated meeting. Date of next meeting To take place after Easter recess, date to be circulated.
The Committee expects to revisit its consideration of the petition after the Parliament’s summer recess. We would therefore welcome a response by Friday 18 August, which we hope gives you sufficient time to source the relevant information or data.
Further to my letter of 22 June, I do not expect that the final version of NPF4 will be laid immediately on return following the Summer recess, but rather I would anticipate doing so in mid-Autumn.
Parliamentary Business Team January 2022 PB/S6/22/14 Motions for removal Reference Member Name Date Title Total Achieved Date Last Lodged support cross party Supported support?
We will publish the analysis and our response before Parliament’s summer recess. Licensing or regulation of this sector is expected to require legislation to be put to the Scottish Parliament, and so any proposals will remain subject to parliamentary process.
In your letter you invite the Finance and Public Administration Committee to propose an appropriate date to conclude the Parliamentary consultation phase of the Review.
The Committee expects to revisit its consideration of the petition after the Parliament’s summer recess. We would therefore welcome a response by Friday 18 August, which we hope gives you sufficient time to source the relevant information or data.