This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
Completion of the Register:
The Committee previously recommended that completion of the Register is a pre-condition for undertaking other administrative and financial changes and / or transactions relating to the land.
In its written submission, West Lothian Council stated that—
Part of the effectiveness of the act lies in activity under the act being available as evidence to show ‘pre-apprehension’ in Dangerous Dogs Act cases taken by Police Scotland.
Please explain why the preamble does not narrate which of these pre-conditions is met? What do you consider to be the legal consequence of this omission?
The Scottish Government accepted the CCC high ambition scenario as Scotland’s targets should be very challenging, and should reflect a fair contribution to maintaining global temperatures to well below 2 degrees above pre-industrial levels as set out in the Paris Agreement.
Over three sessions the Committee undertook pre-budget scrutiny, with evidence from Highlands and Islands Enterprise, Scottish Enterprise and West Lothian Chamber of Commerce.
For example, the Local Government and Communities Committee heard, during their 2018-19 pre-budget scrutiny evidence, that it could be more difficult to develop particular types of homes.
Pre-Negotiation & Negotiation
Prior to the commencement of the CETA negotiations, the provinces expressed varying levels of interest in direct involvement of their officials in the process.
The Committee heard that the Scottish system of verification/certification is very much a pre-emptive system with the Local Authority Building Standards Scotland (LABSS) guidance entitled Verification during Construction- Non-Domestic Buildings: Guidance to Support the Application of Reasonable Inquiry1Scottish Government. (2013, February).
The Committee considers that this would enhance the opportunity for Parliamentary scrutiny of the Code, in line with the importance of the Code as set out above, by requiring both a pre-scrutiny Parliamentary consultation phase on the proposed draft Code, and a vote to approve the final draft Code before it could be issued.