This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
I suggest that, in the short paper that the clerk is going to develop, he gives us a time frame for when he thinks that that conference would most usefully come into our work, and then we will get into the bidding process.
We had a useful meeting last Friday with the Scottish industry and some of the major enforcement authorities to thrash out the final text of a consultation letter on an enforcement regime in relation to a tiered system for Scotland. However, that is for ASP. To develop matters, we aim to put that letter out on Friday.
The process is continuing and we will move on to part 2, which I believe is the most important part.Robert Brown's suggestion of a sinking fund is wonderful. It always seems to be timeshare owners who know about sinking funds.
The document that has been published marks a welcome development, but there needs to be further discussion between the European Committee and the other relevant committees about how we develop that.
The document that has been published marks a welcome development, but there needs to be further discussion between the European Committee and the other relevant committees about how we develop that.
Does he share my view that head teachers should not be scraping about to find funds to set them up? I thank Rosemary Byrne for that intervention and I very much agree with her.
Members will recall that there was a question about whether the affirmative procedure could provide the necessary flexibility. The Executive has written back to say that that would be difficult if there was an emergency situation in a parliamentary recess, so it suggests that the negative procedure would be better.