Skip to main content
Loading…

Search

There are 13,317 results relating to "De v"

Order by |

Refine your search

Select from the available filters to refine your search


Available filters:

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].

Official Report Meeting date: 23 November 2005

Justice 1 Committee, 23 Nov 2005

I know that that legislation absolutely operates—although it is not perfect in every case, and the committee is sorting out the situation in respect of Wallis v Wallis and so on—but it does not apply to cohabiting couples.
Official Report Meeting date: 14 September 2004

Justice 2 Committee, 14 Sep 2004

The interpretation of the term "reasonably practicable" to which the Scottish Executive adheres was set out in Edwards v NCB, but there is a challenge to United Kingdom authority in relation to that interpretation, on the grounds that it is not proper and is contrary to European Community law—that is all that I will say about the matter.
Official Report Meeting date: 12 May 2004

Public Petitions Committee, 12 May 2004

If Parliament is not willing to give us that remedy by honouring convention-guaranteed rights in the legislation, our people will await an opportunity to go to court. In the case of Macdonald v Advocate General for Scotland, the Westminster MP for Edinburgh Pentlands decided personally to argue against the right not to suffer discrimination of lesbian and g...
Official Report Meeting date: 12 May 2004

Justice 1 Committee, 12 May 2004

That has already been adjudicated upon by the court in Strasbourg. In the case of Rees v UK in October 1986, the court adjudicated to the effect that a bar on marriage between two people of the same sex does not infringe article 12.
Official Report Meeting date: 11 February 2004

Education Committee, 11 Feb 2004

I recognise that the minister's amendment 63 applies a different test, the principle of which he has eloquently explained this morning, and I am very grateful to him for accepting the principle of my amendment, which he must have done before lodging amendment 63.For the record, I mention that there has been a significant House of Lords ruling on the subject. In 1988, the ruling in the Regina v East Sussex County Council ex parte Tandy case stated that duties to educate children with special educational needs were absolute and could not be avoided because of cost.
Official Report Meeting date: 3 February 2004

Communities Committee, 03 Feb 2004

The criteria that constitute a breach of the peace in Scots law were set out in the case of Smith v Donnelly in 2001—I say that in case members did not know it.
Official Report Meeting date: 23 September 2003

Justice 2 Committee, 23 Sep 2003

The provision is designed to address an unfortunate problem that arose in the Grimmond v HMA case, which is mentioned in the policy memorandum to the bill.
Official Report Meeting date: 4 April 2001

Social Justice Committee, 04 Apr 2001

A year or two ago there was a legal case—Begum v Tower Hamlets—that concerned somebody who had a home in Bangladesh.
Official Report Meeting date: 27 March 2001

Equal Opportunities Committee, 27 Mar 2001

In both cases, the courts followed the guidelines that were set down by the House of Lords in 1983 in the case of Mandla v Dowell Lee on what constitutes an ethnic group.
Official Report Meeting date: 13 March 2001

Justice 1 Committee, 13 Mar 2001

We are submitting a bid to SLAB under part V of the Legal Aid (Scotland) Act 1986 for a project that we are developing to put in place solicitors to support six bureaux, not to deal with casework but, if necessary, to support the bureau workers to provide the best possible advice before cases are referred on.

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].