There are 5,384 results relating to "table.i V"
Order by
|
Committees
Published:
30 April 2025
The Supreme Court Judgment in For Women Scotland Ltd (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent): Maggie Chapman MSP
Read the correspondence.
For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers to Faculty of Advocates 30 April 2025.
Committees
Published:
28 April 2025
The Supreme Court Judgment in For Women Scotland Ltd (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent)
The Supreme Court Judgment in For Women Scotland Ltd (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent).
Committees
Published:
25 April 2025
The Supreme Court Judgment in For Women Scotland Ltd (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent)
The Supreme Court Judgment in For Women Scotland Ltd (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent).
Committees
Published:
24 April 2025
The Supreme Court Judgment in For Women Scotland Ltd (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent)
The Supreme Court Judgment in For Women Scotland Ltd (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent).
Committees
Published:
23 April 2025
The Supreme Court Judgment in For Women Scotland Ltd (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent)
The Supreme Court Judgment in For Women Scotland Ltd (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent).
Committees
Published:
22 April 2025
The Supreme Court Judgment in For Women Scotland Ltd (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent): Maggie Chapman MSP
Read the correspondence
.
For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers Faculty of Advocates 22 April 2025.
Committees
Published:
17 April 2025
The Supreme Court Judgment in For Women Scotland Ltd (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent)
The Supreme Court Judgment in For Women Scotland Ltd (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent).
SPICe briefings
Date published:
10 January 2019
Informed Consent in Healthcare Settings - 1.2 When is consent valid?
An absence of consent or lawful authority can infringe the patient's autonomy and violate their bodily integrity.iiBreaching Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights: Glass v United Kingdom [2004] 1 FLR 1019, ECtHR.
Committee reports
Date published:
14 June 2018
Prescription (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1 Report - The impact of the David T Morrison v ICL Plasticscase
The impact of the David T Morrison v ICL Plastics case
Prior to the Morrison case, it was thought that section 11(3) of the 1973 Act meant that the five year prescription period was postponed until the pursuer knew that:
he or she had suffered loss, injury or damage; and
that loss injury or damage had been caused by fault or negligence.
Last updated:
9 January 2024
European University Institute EU Exit Regulations 2022
Sco ttish Min iste r s , sp e cial adv is e r s a nd th e Pe r m a n e n t Se cr e ta ry a r e co v e r e d by th e te r m s of th e Lobby in g (Sco tla nd) Act 2 0 1 6 .
