There are 6,150 results relating to "Entrega r"
|
Last updated:
19 April 2023
NHS Borders Evidence Pack
P l Diagnostics (8 key tests) - Number Zero patients waiting longer than 6 weeks for 8 key a ↑ Dec-22 1202 Jan-23 1073 n waiting >6 weeks diagnostic tests oita CAMHS- % treated within 18 weeks of r ↓ 90% patients seen and treated within 18 weeks of referral Nov-22 31.3% Dec-22 30.8% e referral pO A&E 4 Hour Standard - Patients l 95% of patients seen, discharged or transferred within 4 a ↑ discharged or transferred within 4 Dec-22 63.5% Jan-23 64.7% hours u hours nn Delayed Discharges - Patients A ↑ Zero patients delayed in hospital for more than 72 hours Dec-22 33 Jan-23 45 delayed over 72 hours Psychological Therapies - % treated ↓ 90% patient treated within 18 weeks of referral Nov-22 84.1% Dec-22 81.3% within 18 weeks of referral Drug & Alcohol - Treated within 3 ↔ 90% patient treated within 3 weeks of referral Nov-22 100% Dec-22 100% weeks of referral ↑ Sickness Absence Rates Maintain overall sickness absence rates below 4% Dec-22 6.41% Jan-23 6.91% 14 Cancer Waiting Times (please note there is a 1-month lag time for data) Fig. 9 95% of suspicion of cancer cases seen within 62 Days Percentage Mean UCL LCL Standard % 120% 110% 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 9 0 0 1 1 2 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 9 0 1 2 9 0 1 2 3 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - l l l l l t t t t t r r r r r r r r r c c c c c y y y y y v v v v v g g g g g p b p b p b p b p n n n n n n n n n n c c c c c u u u u u a a a a p p p p p e e e e e a a a a a o o o o o u u u u u a a a a a e e e e e e e e e u u u u u J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J O O O O O A A A A A S F S F S F S F S D D D D D A A A A A N N N N N M M M M M M M M M Fig. 10 95% of cancer treatment patients treated within 31 Days Percentage Mean UCL LCL Standard % 105% 100% 95% 90% 85% 80% 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 9 0 0 1 1 2 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 9 0 1 2 9 0 1 2 3 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - l l l l l t t t t t r r r r r r r r r c c c c c y y y y y v v v v v g g g g g p b p b p b p b p n n n n n n n n n n c c c c c u u u u u a a a a p p p p p e e e e e a a a a a o o o o o u u u u u a a a a a e e e e e e e e e u u u u u J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J O O O O O A A A A A S F S F S F S F S D D D D D A A A A A N N N N N M M M M M M M M M 15 Stage of Treatment- Outpatients Waiting Over 12 Weeks Stage of Treatment Target - Outpatients Waiting Over 12 Weeks 12wks Mean UCL LCL 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 10000 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 9 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 9 0 1 2 9 0 1 2 3 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - l l l l l t t t t t r r r r r r r r r c c c c c y y y y y v v v v v g g g g g p b p b p b p b p b n n n n n n n n n n -1000 c c c c c u u u u u a a a a p p p p p e e e e e a a a a a o o o o o u u u u u a a a a a e e e e e e e e e e u u u u u J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J O O O O O A A A A A S F S F S F S F S F D D D D D A A A A A N N N N N M M M M M M M M M Fig. 11 16 Stage of Treatment- Inpatients Waiting Over 12 Weeks Stage of Treatment Target - Inpatients Waiting Over 12 Weeks 12wks Mean UCL LCL 2500 2000 1500 1000 5000 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 9 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 9 0 1 2 9 0 1 2 3 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - l l l l l t t t t t r r r r r r r r r c c c c c y y y y y v v v v v g g g g g p b p b p b p b p b n n n n n n n n n n c c c c c u u u u u a a a a p p p p p e e e e e a a a a a o o o o o u u u u u a a a a a e e e e e e e e e e u u u u u J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J O O O O O A A A A A S F S F S F S F S F D D D D D A A A A A N N N N N M M M M M M M M M Fig. 12 17 Patients Treated within the 12 weeks Treatment Time Guarantee Patients Treated within the 12 weeks Treatment Time Guarantee 12wks TTG Mean UCL LCL 250 200 150 100 500 -50 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 9 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 9 0 1 2 3 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - l l l l l t t t t t r r r r r r r r r c c c c c y y y y y v v v v v g g g g g p b p b p b p b p b n n n n n n n n n n c c c c c u u u u u a a a a p p p p p e e e e e a a a a a o o o o o u u u u u a a a a a e e e e e e e e e e u u u u u J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J O O O O O A A A A A S F S F S F S F S F D D D D D A A A A A N N N N N M M M M M M M M M Fig. 13 18 18 Weeks Referral to Treatment Combined Pathway Performance 18 Weeks Percentage Referral to Treatment Combined Pathway Performance Percentage Mean UCL LCL Standard % 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 9 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 8 9 0 1 2 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 9 0 1 2 3 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - l l l l l t t t t t r r r r r r r r r c c c c c y y y y y v v v v v g g g g g p b p b p b p b p b n n n n n n n n n n u u u u u c c c c c a a a a p p p p p e e e e e a a a a a o o o o o u u u u u a a a a a e e e e e e e e e e u u u u u J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J O O O O O A A A A A S F S F S F S F S F D D D D D A A A A A N N N N N M M M M M M M M M Fig. 14 19 Diagnostic Waits Diagnostics Waits over 6 Weeks Number over 6 weeks Mean UCL LCL 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 2000 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 9 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 9 0 1 2 3 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - l l l l l t t t t t r r r r r r r r r c c c c c y y y y y v v v v v g g g g g p b p b p b p b p b n n n n n n n n n n u u u u u c c c c c a a a a p p p p p e e e e e a a a a a o o o o o u u u u u a a a a a e e e e e e e e e e u u u u u J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J O O O O O A A A A A S F S F S F S F S F D D D D D A A A A A N N N N N M M M M M M M M M Fig. 15 20 CAMHS Waiting Times- 18 Week Referral to Treatment 18 Week Referral to Treatment for CAMHS Percentage Mean UCL LCL Standard % 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 9 0 0 1 1 2 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 9 0 1 2 3 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - l l l l l t t t t t r r r r r r r r r c c c c c y y y y y v v v v v g g g g g p b p b p b p b p n n n n n n n n n n u u u u u c c c c c a a a a p p p p p e e e e e a a a a a o o o o o u u u u u a a a a a e e e e e e e e e u u u u u J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J O O O O O A A A A A S F S F S F S F S D D D D D A A A A A N N N N N M M M M M M M M M Fig. 16 21 Psychological Therapies Waiting Times- 18 Week Referral to Treatment 18 Week Referral to Treatment for Pyschological Therapies Percentage Mean UCL LCL Standard % 110% 90% 70% 50% 30% 10% -10% 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 9 0 0 1 1 2 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 9 0 1 2 9 0 1 2 3 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - l l l l l t t t t t r r r r r r r r r c c c c c y y y y y v v v v v g g g g g p b p b p b p b p n n n n n n n n n n c c c c c u u u u u a a a a p p p p p e e e e e a a a a a o o o o o u u u u u a a a a a e e e e e e e e e u u u u u J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J O O O O O A A A A A S F S F S F S F S D D D D D A A A A A N N N N N M M M M M M M M M Fig. 17 22 Delayed Discharges Fig. 18 23 Fig. 19 DDs at Census Delayed over 72 Hours DDs over 72 hours (3 days) Mean UCL LCL 70 60 50 40 30 20 100 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 9 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 8 9 0 1 2 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 9 0 1 2 3 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - l l l l l t t t t t r r r r r r r r r c c c c c y y y y y v v v v v g g g g g p b p b p b p b p b n n n n n n n n n n u u u u u c c c c c a a a a p p p p p e e e e e a a a a a o o o o o u u u u u a a a a a e e e e e e e e e e u u u u u J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J O O O O O A A A A A S F S F S F S F S F D D D D D A A A A A N N N N N M M M M M M M M M Fig. 20 Standard Delayed Bed Days Standard Delayed Bed Days Mean UCL LCL 2000 1500 1000 5000 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 9 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 9 0 1 2 3 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - l l l l l t t t t t r r r r r r r r r c c c c c y y y y y v v v v v g g g g g p b p b p b p b p b n n n n n n n n n n u u u u u c c c c c a a a a p p p p p e e e e e a a a a a o o o o o u u u u u a a a a a e e e e e e e e e e u u u u u J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J O O O O O A A A A A S F S F S F S F S F D D D D D A A A A A N N N N N M M M M M M M M M 24 Drugs & Alcohol 3 Week Drugs and Alcohol Referral to Treatment Percentage Mean UCL LCL Standard % 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 9 0 0 1 1 2 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 9 0 1 2 9 0 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - l l l l l t t t t t r r r r r r r r r c c c c c y y y y y v v v v v g g g g g p b p b p b p b p n n n n n n n n n c c c c c u u u u u a a a a p p p p p e e e e e a a a a a o o o o o u u u u u a a a a e e e e e e e e e u u u u u J J J J J J J J J J J J J J O O O O O A A A A A S F S F S F S F S D D D D D A A A A A N N N N N M M M M M M M M M Fig. 21 25 Number of Alcohol Brief Interventions Delivered Trajectory Tolerance 2018/19 2020/21 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2500 2000 1500 1000 5000 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Fig. 22 26 Sickness Absence Sickness Absence Percentage below 4% 8% Percentage Mean UCL LCL Standard % 6% 4% 2% 0% … … … … … … … … … - - - - - - - - - 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 9 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 8 9 0 1 2 8 9 0 1 2 9 0 1 2 3 r r r r y y y y y 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 a a a a a a a a a - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - l l l l l t t t t t r r r r r c c c c c v v v v v g g g g g p b p b p b p b p b n n n n n n n n n n M M M M c c c c c u u u u u M M M M M p p p p p e e e e e o o o o o u u u u u a a a a a e e e e e e e e e e u u u u u J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J O O O O O A A A A A S F S F S F S F S F D D D D D A A A A A N N N N N Fig. 23 Covid Absence Percentage Percentage Mean UCL LCL 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% -1% 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 2 2 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - l l l t t t r r r r r c c c y y y v v v g g g p b p b p b n n n n n n u u u c c c a a p p p e e e a a a o o o u u u a a a e e e e e e u u u J J J J J J J J J O O O A A A S F S F S F D D D A A A N N N M M M M M Fig. 24 27 Smoking Quits (Please Note: All figures are cumulative.
Last updated:
9 October 2023
Wildlife Bill snaring NASC 5 October
Mammal Review 37: 278-296. 84. Summers RW, Green RE, Proctor R, Dugan D, Lambie D, Moncrieff R, Moss R & Baines D (2004) An experimental study of the effects of predation on the breeding productivity of capercaillie and black grouse.
Committees
Published:
26 May 2022
New Vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Further Submission R Trythall
New Vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides Further Submission R Trythall.
Committees
Published:
21 April 2022
New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Submission R Trythall
New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides Submission from R Trythall.
Committees
Published:
20 June 2022
New Vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: R Trythall Third submission
New Vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides R Trythall Third submission.
Last updated:
7 November 2024
Teach Learn Play report
Original target number of primary schools (n~90) Accessible Small Remote Small Large Urban Other Urban Accessible Rural Remote Rural PRI Town Town l l l l l l s a a a a a a l r r r r r r d d d d d d r r r r r r o u u u u u u Rolls at e e e e e e t t t t t t e e e e e e f f f f f f o s s s s s s R R R R R R e e e e e e b b b b b b o o o o o o / / / / / / o o o o o o h g g g g g g Sep r r r r r r c m m m m m m n n n n n n p p p p p p % % % % s % % a a a a a a a a a a a a u u u u u u o o o o o o t t t t t t l r r r r r r b b b b b b l N N N N N N 2011 r r r r r r P P P P P P A U U U U U U <50 435 0 0% 0 8 2% 1 7 4% 0 3 4% 0 154 35% 7 263 64% 11 50‐99 279 14 3% 1 27 5% 2 18 11% 1 8 12% 0 119 27% 5 93 23% 4 100‐199 534 143 29% 6 163 32% 7 43 27% 2 21 30% 1 125 29% 6 39 9% 2 200‐299 448 162 33% 7 169 33% 7 55 35% 2 20 29% 1 26 6% 1 16 4% 1 300‐399 289 129 26% 6 112 22% 5 25 16% 1 13 19% 1 10 2% 0 0 0% 0 400+ 96 47 9% 2 33 6% 1 9 6% 0 4 6% 0 3 1% 0 0 0% 0 Totals 2081 495 100% 22 512 100% 23 157 100% 6 69 100% 3 437 100% 19 411 100% 18 22 http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Statistics/Browse/School-Education/schoolcontactdetails [accessed 18/6/12] 31 Table 32.
Committees
Published:
14 April 2023
Scotland’s electricity infrastructure: inhibitor or enabler of our energy ambitions?
Read the correspondence.
Submission from Professor R A Williams, FREng FTSE, FRSE, Heriot-Watt University, 14 April 2023.
Last updated:
28 January 2025
UKSI Official Controls Plant Health and Phytosanitary Conditions etc Annex H letter
During the period when the PH/052/R notification was being considered by the RAI Committee, additional powers were incorporated, and various pest names in Annex 2 and the list of provisional GB quarnatine pests were updated to ensure those pests are indentifed by their current names.
Last updated:
9 November 2022
Food and Feed Regulations Letter and Notification
Fa icib h w w w .lob b y in g.s co t Sco ttish Min iste r s , sp e cial adv is e r s a nd th e Pe r m a n e n t Se cr e ta ry a r e co v e r e d by th e te r m s of th e Lobby in g (Sco tla nd) Act 2 0 1 6 .
Last updated:
30 June 2025
Forth Valley College AGS to PAC 18 June 2025_Redacted
C It was explained by the DOF that the sector has b en involved in a job evaluation exercise for support staff for a number of years and tha to fund the outcome of this, SFC had been top slicing funding from the sect r’s allo ations of grant in aid from Scottish Government and retaining this for he p p se of settling subsequent JE d expenditure that may eme...
