Conclusions
The CommitteeiThese conclusions (paragraphs 102-109) were agreed by division (For 4 (Clare Adamson MSP, George Adam MSP, Keith Brown MSP; Patrick Harvie MSP); Against 3 (Jamie Halcro Johnston MSP, Stephen Kerr MSP; Neil Bibby MSP); Abstentions 0) notes the broad consensus expressed by witnesses and by its advisers as to the current legal position in relation to any future independence referendum:
That international law confers no legal right for Scotland unilaterally to secede from the United Kingdom nor unilaterally to hold a referendum on the question of Scottish independence;
Therefore, that the question of Scottish independence must be answered in accordance with the United Kingdom’s constitutional arrangements;
That the multi-national character of the United Kingdom’s constitution is reflected in the Acts of Union that created a new state, Great Britain, while preserving distinct Scottish national institutions in law, education, local government and religion;
That while the Scottish constitutional tradition of the sovereignty of the people is widely accepted, the UK’s constitutional arrangements vest legal sovereignty (i.e. the highest law-making authority) in the UK Parliament;
Therefore, the primary route for Scotland to become independent is an Act of (the UK) Parliament providing directly for Scottish independence or enabling the Scottish Parliament to declare independence;
That this is so notwithstanding that the Acts of Union make no provision for their dissolution and declare that the union between Scotland and England is to last “forever”, nor the common perception that a voluntary Union entered into by two parties could reasonably and commonly be understood to imply a process for its dissolution;
That the Scotland Act 1998 reserves both “the union of the Kingdoms of Scotland and England” and “the Parliament of the United Kingdom” to the United Kingdom Parliament and makes the Acts of Union subject to that Act;
That the Supreme Court has determined that legislation authorising a referendum on Scottish independence would “relate to” these reserved matters and therefore would be outside of the Scottish Parliament’s legislative competence;
Therefore, that in order for the Scottish Parliament to legislate for an independence referendum this would require a transfer of legislative competence either by a section 30 order or by primary legislation made by the UK Parliament;
That the 2014 referendum was legislated for by the Scottish Parliament on the basis of an agreement between the Scottish and UK Governments and a section 30 order that was approved by both the Scottish and UK Parliaments;
That this section 30 order established a time-limited power to provide for that specific referendum and was not intended to establish a legal precedent.