This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
We have heard plenty of evidence from previous witnesses to suggest that there is a problem with competing land use in the countryside: we need homes for sustainable communities, but we are saying that we cannot build there because of X, Y and Z—there is a range of issues. Would you like to talk about how we can balance those two things?
However, at this stage, I cannot say for definite that we will do X, Y and Z until we discuss the detail. Before I start my other questions, I want to go back to the minister's previous response to Bill Kidd.
Small companies often say that the barrier for them is that they do not have an in-house, dedicated resource to help them to look at how they get into market X, Y or Z. They cannot afford to pay for someone new to come in to do that and the international manager for hire programme provides such companies with that resource.
If a tenant has an issue and does not want to say that the person upstairs is doing X, Y or Z, they can phone a number and the professional witness will come out, observe and take notes.
That said, I have checked the instructions in the online A to Z that the training for jobcentre staff refers to for guiding people through what is a very large and complicated process.
A phone call can be made to a colleague in revenues and benefits to ask whether landlords X, Y and Z are registered. In some areas the two departments speak to each other, but in other areas that does not happen at all.
The evidence that the Scottish Golf Union gave last week highlighted the point that, often, a national governing body will approach a local authority and suggest that it could provide X, Y and Z if the authority allowed it to run a programme in its schools.
The forms are not about the project per se, but about how we might do X, Y or Z. To be frank, our track record and those of our competitors speak for themselves in that regard.
Various providers offer such a service and, as I understand it, they do not go back to the GP and say, "We tested this person for X, Y and Z." Is there a uniform view among pressure groups and organisations that assist gay and bisexual individuals?