There are 102,330 results relating to "Cele mai ieftine Olanzapin"
Order by
|
Last updated:
10 June 2024
$name
Limitation (Childhood Abuse) (Scotland) Bill [AS INTRODUCED] An Act of the Scottish Parliament to remove the limitation period for actions of damages in respect of personal injuries resulting from childhood abuse. 1 Removal of 3 year limitation period in certain actions After section 17 of the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973 insert— 5 “17A Actions in respect of personal injuries resulting from childhood abuse (1) The time limit in section 17 does not apply to an action of damages if— (a) the damages claimed consist of damages in respect of personal injuries, (b) the person who sustained the injuries was a child on the date the act or omission to which the injuries were attributable occurred or, where the 10 act or omission was a continuing one, the date the act or omission began, (c) the act or omission to which the injuries were attributable constitutes abuse of the person who sustained the injuries, and (d) the action is brought by the person who sustained the injuries. (2) In this section— 15 “abuse” includes sexual abuse, physical abuse and emotional abuse, “child” means an individual under the age of 18. 17B Childhood abuse actions: previously accrued rights of action Section 17A has effect as regards a right of action accruing before the commencement of section 17A. 20 17C Childhood abuse actions: previously litigated rights of action (1) This section applies where a right of action in respect of relevant personal injuries has been disposed of in the circumstances described in subsection (2). (2) The circumstances are that— (a) prior to the commencement of section 17A, an action of damages was 25 brought in respect of the right of action (“the initial action”), and SP Bill 1 Session 5 (2016) 2 Limitation (Childhood Abuse) (Scotland) Bill (b) the initial action was disposed of by the court— (i) by reason of section 17, or (ii) in accordance with a relevant settlement. (3) A person may...
Last updated:
2 June 2023
Ethical Standards PO to PAC 11 May 2023
If a governance issue arises, we would expect the Accountable Officer (who may or may not be the Officeholder) to engage their own AAB and depending on the nature of the issue, report it to Audit Scotland and inform the SPCB.
Last updated:
25 May 2023
Chamber_Minutes_20230525
MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS Parliamentary Year 3, No. 6, Session 6 Meeting of the Parliament Thursday 25 May 2023 Note: (DT) signifies a decision taken at Decision Time.
Last updated:
20 March 2026
SPCB 2026 Paper 19
Average rents in the EH postcode districts peaked at over £1,600pcm in May 2025, but have since stabilised at around £1,400-£1,500pcm.
Last updated:
22 October 2025
PE2161_D
Depending on the framing of legislation, this means we may need separate evidence of a cognitive disability.
Last updated:
16 January 2025
SPBill32AENS062025accessible
However, if a person is prosecuted for a “relevant offence”, evidence that the person failed to comply with the code may be relied on as tending to establish liability (that is, may be treated as evidence that the person committed the offence).
Last updated:
16 January 2025
SPBill32AENS062025
Similarly, evidence that the person complied with the code may be relied on as tending to negative liability (that is, may be treated as evidence that the person did not commit the offence). 16.
Last updated:
11 June 2024
$name
This document relates to the Writers to the Signet Dependants' Annuity Fund Amendment (Scotland) Bill (SP Bill 13) as introduced in the Scottish Parliament on 18 May 201717 May 2017 Writers to the Signet Dependants’ Annuity Fund Amendment (Scotland) Bill —————————— Promoter’s Memorandum Introduction 1.
Last updated:
10 June 2024
$name
In particular, it is understood that some records of convictions may be kept in such a way whereby the physical removal of details of a conviction may be very difficult e.g. information is kept on a microfiche showing scanned copies of hundreds of convictions.
Last updated:
24 March 2026
SPBill79BS062026
Permitted deduction by liable persons from levy payable 1ZA Permitted deduction by liable persons from levy payable (1) The 2024 Act is modified as follows. 35 (2) After section 12 insert— “12A Permitted deduction by liable persons from levy payable (1) In introducing or modifying a VL scheme, a local authority may permit liable persons to deduct and retain an amount from the levy payable in respect of a chargeable transaction. 40 (2) If a local authority permits deductions to be made by liable persons under subsection (1), it must set the maximum amount of such a 3 Visitor Levy (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill Part 1—Amendments to the Visitor Levy (Scotland) Act 2024 deduction in relation to the VL scheme (in this Act, the maximum amount set in relation to a VL scheme is referred to as “the permitted deduction”). (3) The permitted deduction may be— 5 (a) a fixed amount, or (b) a percentage of the amount of the levy payable in respect of a chargeable transaction. (4) The permitted deduction may be different for different purposes. (5) The power under subsection (1) may be exercised by a local authority 10 only if it is satisfied that it is appropriate to do so to take account of 1 administrative costs that may be incurred by liable persons in connection with the VL scheme. 12B Regulations: further provision about deductions by liable persons from levy payable 15 (1) The Scottish Ministers may by regulations make further provision for or in connection with local authorities permitting liable persons under section 12A(1) to deduct and retain an amount from the levy payable in respect of a chargeable transaction. (2) Regulations under subsection (1) may, in particular, make provision 20 about— (a) local authorities disallowing the deduction and retention of such amounts in relation to relevant periods (within the meaning of section 26(4)), (b) the procedure applying in connection with decisions of local 25 authorities to disallow the deduction and retention of such amounts, (c) time limits for payment of amounts of unpaid levy following decisions of local authorities to disallow the deduction and retention of such amounts, (d) the effect of decisions of local authorities to disallow the deduction 30 and retention of such amounts for the purposes of the imposition of penalties under Chapter 3 of Part 5. (3) Regulations under subsection (1) may modify any enactment (including this Act). (4) Regulations under subsection (1)— 35 (a) are subject to the affirmative procedure if they add to, replace or omit any part of the text of an Act, (b) otherwise, are subject to the negative procedure.”.
